User talk:WikilegendWP

January 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, you may be blocked from editing. --VViking_TalkEdits 14:22, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. VViking_TalkEdits 15:20, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Can somebody help me move my Sam Sylvester page into the mainspace I'm not quite sure how to.

WikilegendWP

@WikilegendWP:, I have added a template to the Draft:Sam Sylvester page you created. If you feel it is ready, you can follow the instructions in the gray box at the top of the page and it will be submitted to the Articles for Creation process. I should warn you, however, that it is certain to be rejected in its current form. You have not included any independent reliable sources for the article. I suggest you read the Biographies of Living Persons Policy and the Your First Article help page. Hope this helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 03:09, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Sylvester (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sam Sylvester and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sam Sylvester, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dial911 (talk) 04:43, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! WikilegendWP, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dial911 (talk) 04:43, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alex Shih (talk) 05:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikilegendWP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand why I've been blocked and I'm sorry if I overstepped. I don't mean to be over promotional and repetitive but I and a group of people really want this page around and if I can't write it I don't mind as long as someone does. I'm happy to take pointers and improve and fix my language. Please you can block me forever but please help me write this one article. This boy has changed my life and millions of others. He saved my suicide and I want to thank him and help others hide him because he is a saviour. He is my saviour. Please someone help me. WikilegendWP (talk) 12:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It appears that you represent a group of people and your wishes evolve around the creation of an article that you appear to have a conflict of interest with. This is not behavior consistent with our policies and behavioral guidelines. Can you describe how you're going to contribute positively to the project and how you'll assure that your edits reflect a neutral point of view? ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 12:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikilegendWP (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise I can keep it professional. I'll add some reliable secondary sources. I'll make sure to keep it strictly factual and no "Terms like "leading expert" and "ground-breaking technology"". I can do it I just need a bit of help formatting wise and I'm good to go. I do not know him nor have I paid to be writing this so I can keep it to a neutral point of view and keep his life and achievements very factual. I'll also get them checked over before they are published. WikilegendWP (talk) 12:41, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. If you wish to write about a completely different topic area, feel free to request an unblock. Yamla (talk) 13:08, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.