User talk:Wikilearn2017

December 2017

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Parichay Times. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Matthew_hk t c 15:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikilearn2017 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can anyone describe why I am blocked?

Decline reason:

Certainly. 2017-12-07T16:04:07 Bbb23 blocked Wikilearn2017 with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (: Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MyeraMishra -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:24, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.