User talk:Wikihatesfreedom

February 2017

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Gregg Doyel that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 03:08, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gregg Doyel. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. —C.Fred (talk) 03:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You've just broken WP:3RR. I would recommend self-reverting, as now I can report you. Sro23 (talk) 03:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 03:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Block extended to one week and talkpage access revoked due to abuse. Given the username and the previous history on the article in question it really should be an indefinite block, and will be if this continues. Acroterion (talk) 04:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Ballsohard55 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]