User talk:Wikigrrl21

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Penis. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:44, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2008

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Penis, you will be blocked from editing. Tresiden (talk) 17:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last warning before block

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:47, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What I did was not intended to be vandalism. I was removing obscene content that triggered flashbacks from when I was almost raped by a man. Wikigrrl21 (talk) 17:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then don't look at it. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want other people to see it either. Pornography leads to rape. Wikigrrl21 (talk) 17:56, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And censorship on Wikipedia will lead to blocking. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL JayKeaton (talk) 01:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What you men don't understand is that rape is far worse than a little censorship. Wikigrrl21 (talk) 18:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not censored. See WP:CENSOR for a discussion of why it may contain images that some people find disturbing. You are welcome to discuss your concerns on the talk page of the article you would like images removed from or replaced by other images. Such discussions go on all the time. Images which are considered pornographic are often replaced with other images such as line drawings or less prurient images which convey the desired encyclopedic information. Conservapedia is what results when articles about "naughty" body parts are deleted and all possibly disturbing images are deleted. Edison (talk) 18:02, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Conservapedia is a patriarchal tool but those images look like they are about ot attack me. Can't you just use drawings or something? Wikigrrl21 (talk) 18:04, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Line drawings or other deliberately non-prurient illustrations are commonly used in articles about sex. Edison (talk) 18:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then use them here. We don't need an animation of a penis cumming Wikigrrl21 (talk) 20:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move of Sonic

Please do not move articles to pages on which they do not belong. This is completely unconstructive. Mynameisnotpj (talk) 01:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]