User talk:Wikifrenzy

Hi, regarding your edits to Toy Story and a lot of other articles, first is the accepted usage as opposed to 1st. And the information you introduced is already there elsewhere in the article. Please read through the article before making such edits. Thanks. - TwoOars ^{(T | C)} 08:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caution: Manual of style on many articles. using TW

April 2007

Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did to many articles. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

As above, using first as opposed to 1st is the accepted style. I am reverting your edits now. Please do not continue to change them or you may be blocked. Daggoth | Talk 09:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for fifth and 5th on Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (film). I suggest you quickly browse through the Manual of Style before making edits such as these. Thank you! --Fbv65e del / ☑t / ☛c || 11:57, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Snowball (The Simpsons)

You added information that Snowball the cat was 20 years old. That does't seem to make sense, given that the article is about five different cats named Snowball, and even if you could cite a source for that age for one of them, it clearly isn't true of all of them. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Given the above, I'd really like to see a source for your age change to Kearney (Simpsons). -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:54, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be changing the ages of a lot of Simpsons characters. Do you have a source for this? I'm going to assume that you are just making these numbers up and revert all for now, unless you do in fact have a reliable source for the changes you're making. -FisherQueen (Talk) 13:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to add unsourced or original content, as you did to Edna Krabappel, is considered vandalism and may result in a block. -FisherQueen (Talk) 14:03, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 1854, you will be blocked from editing. -FisherQueen (Talk) 14:06, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

James & John's Plush Comedy

A tag has been placed on James & John's Plush Comedy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:James & John's Plush Comedy. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks. Hqb 17:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Toy comedy

A tag has been placed on Toy comedy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Toy comedy. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Thanks.

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Toy comedy. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. Blanchardb 11:56, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas and Friends - Seasons

Hi, I noticed you changed the episode numbers (like Season 2. Can you tell me why? TobytheTramEngine 04:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]