User talk:Wikieditor70

Hello Wikieditor70,

                  You been adding information in Wiki page Kolkata derby https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolkata_Derby .

However I have provided the authentic link of Fifa.com, i-league.org which is the best source of information for football in India. i-league.org is the official website of AIFF . Still you are making edit I wonder if you are totally avoiding watching these information put together. If Fifa and i-league.org has stated something no other sources can be regarded as more authentic in Indian football. I am providing all the links for your reference.

Please don't edit the page without resolving the dispute. Dasgupta.rony (talk) 06:31, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

References

June 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Kolkata Derby. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Nthep (talk) 15:33, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

I am not interested in who is right or who is wrong about this article but when someone else says you are mistaken and tries to start a discussion on the talk page, you should try participating in that discussion rather than carry on insisting that your version is correct. Nthep (talk) 15:39, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Continuous editing of a wiki page when it has been marked as disputed and been subject to discussion

Hello,

     You are editing the wiki page Kolkata Derby https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolkata_Derby

This page as been marked as disputed and been invited for discussion. Kindly visit the talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kolkata_Derby and provide your views so that an consensus can be reached without blindly editing the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasgupta.rony (talk • contribs) 06:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Dasgupta.rony (talk) 16:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Dasgupta.rony (talk) 16:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Editing Page instead of warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dasgupta.rony (talk • contribs) 18:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC) Dasgupta.rony (talk) 18:18, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Dasgupta.rony (talk) 18:22, 4 June 2017 (UTC)blocked

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Dasgupta.rony (talk) 00:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kolkata Derby, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Many of your recent edits to this page either contradict the sources on the page or are unsourced. You must provide sources to support any edits you make. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 05:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:46, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

August 2018

Hello, I'm Royroydeb. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Borja Gómez Pérez, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! RRD (talk) 10:36, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Wikieditor70. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello, I'm Realmmb. I noticed that you recently removed content from Kolkata Derby without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. REALMMB^(talk) 04:01, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kolkata Derby, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not go on deleting the number of competitive matches, it gets frustrating for me to keep on reverting them so many times. Please talk out your reservations about why that piece of data should not be displayed and talk with me. REALMMB^(talk) 06:47, 10 September 2019 (UTC)