User talk:Wikidpedia

I don't see any deletions User:Jimfbleak has done that are out of line. Which article are you having an issue over? - UtherSRG (talk) 14:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't delete any article at 13.54 26 March. I've checked the deletion log jimfbleak 14:13, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If the comment was aimed at BeanoJosh, that user is not an admin and cannot have deleted an article. jimfbleak 14:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the comment was aimed at jimfbleak. here is the information from the deletion log: 11:46, 26 March 2007 Jimfbleak (Talk | contribs) deleted "Happy march 26 day" (article about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or website that does not assert the importance or significance of the subject. (CSD A7))Wikidpedia 14:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion seems reasonable to me. Wikipedia is not for every little tidbit of information. This "holiday" seems to be limited to a very small number of individuals, and is therefor not encyclopedic content. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Bruce McMahan for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article David Bruce McMahan, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Bruce McMahan until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Falcon8765 ^(TALK) 23:43, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of David Bruce McMahan

A tag has been placed on David Bruce McMahan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Sven Manguard _Talk 00:40, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, Wikidpedia, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it is too close to Wikipedia, which is a violation of "misleading" (i.e broadcasting authority you do not have.) If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. Sven Manguard _Talk 00:48, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wikidpedia | its a pun. [WIKID pedia.] don't think a pun is intentionally misleading anyone. it is the nature of a pun that it is similar to the name wikipedia. i am not a "sock puppet". i made an account years ago, uploaded an event, it was deleted. i haven't done anything on wikipedia since then, until yesterday when i added the page on the individual in question. i am a user who doesn't use wikipedia that often for the clearly apparent politiking which occurs. why are you people so power-hungry? christ. anyway, that's my side. Wikidpedia (talk) 14:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)wikidpedia[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 01:24, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wikidpedia|unblock|disagree that i abused my editing privileges. all i did was make a page to a noteworthy individual; resulting discussion demonstrates noteworthiness. please see original page that i uploaded; nothing against ToS or anything like that. i certainly wasn't disruptive editing. i made one page and didn't do anything after that. thanks.Wikidpedia (talk) 14:30, 9 October 2010 (UTC)wikidpedia[reply]

ANI: Meat, Libel, four AfDs, and assorted weirdness at David Bruce McMahan

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sven Manguard _Talk 02:09, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

wikidpedia | explanation: i don't use the website that often. there is no shenanigans afoot. you can remove the reference. Wikidpedia (talk) 14:36, 9 October 2010 (UTC)wikidpedia[reply]