User talk:Wikiarrangementeditor

Hello, Wikiarrangementeditor! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 05:31, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 07:13, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

As I have told you numerous times, it is not acceptable to revert without explaining clearly why you are doing so. Please discuss your edits on the appropriate talk page and learn to sign your posts as explained by the bot in the above section. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 03:30, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not revert again or you will be reported to WP:ANI/3RR and will likely be blocked again. The source you wish to add comes from a GT-R fan blog and doe not conform to WP:RS or WP:V if something is unclear please ask. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 03:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Nordschleife fastest lap times. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Stifle (talk) 09:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nissan GT-R article

Please try to be more neutral on the nissan GT-R article. I have read many of your edits and I do not think you are maintaining a neutral point of view on the article. I like the Nissan GT-R as much as you do, but you must remember that wikipedia is not a place to show off your favourite cars. It is simply a place to outline the facts regarding the cars. We must not use wikipedia in an attempt to show the world how great the GT-R is; rather, the facts should speak for themselves. Also, remember that in situations where the facts are uncertain, is it better to simply state that the facts are uncertain, rather than taking an opinion on the matter. Hugzz (talk) 00:11, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am a believer of GT-R. However, the untrue information is not put. Information on other cars has been treated equally. The problem is a thing that not me but you have treated only GT-R discriminating. Material even is not submitted about other cars at all though official material of GT-R is thoroughly doubted. The source is only a name of the magazine. And, the rumor that GT-R had used cut slick tire was a false rumor. However, the thing to use semi slicks tire is common sense in Porsche GT2. Why do you want to conceal true information though you published information on the lie many times? The believer of Porsche should apologize.--Wikiarrangementeditor (talk) 06:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:9071115 002 1L.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:9071115 002 1L.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GT-R again

You will need to provide sources that indicate the V Spec name will continue. There are numerous sources indicating that it may change to Spec V. You are changing the text of a well referenced section and could be blocked again if you continue. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 04:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.answers.com/topic/nissan-skyline "R32 Models:GT-R - 2.6 L RB26DETT twin-turbo I6, 280 hp (206 kW, 368 Nm) 4WD also NISMO, V-Spec and V-Spec II variants." and "Active LSD came standard on all V-spec R33 GT-R Skylines." and "R34 Models:GT-R V-Spec GT-R V-Spec II GT-R M-Spec GT-R V-Spec II Nür GT-R M-Spec Nür"--Wikiarrangementeditor (talk) 05:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am aware that the V spec name was used on Skyline GT-Rs, but to reliable sources indicate that the Spec V name will be used on the new GT-R. I hope this is clear as other users have tried to explain this to you. Please ask if you have any questions. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 05:21, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please the source "New GT-R is SpecV". Mizuno is using only a temporary name "SP model".

Here are the two sources used in the article, both confirm the Spec V name and both are reliable [1], [2]. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 05:42, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edmunds.com introduces NISSAN GT-R with TMS07 as "Japanese Supercar". There might not be necessity of our discussion if giving priority to the journalist's guess.Your priority level is always contradicted.

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —EncMstr 05:45, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on Nissan GT-R. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. There was no reasonable rationale given for replacing a good-quality image with one of possible lower quality and/or resolution. Please use the discussion page at Nissan GT-R instead of edit warring, and please cease the pointless character assaults. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nissan GT-R. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Please revert to the previous version (not acknowledging that it is the correct version) to prevent any consequences from violating 3RR. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 06:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Nissan GT-R. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Stifle (talk) 13:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carrera GT laptime

Please discuss your point of view in the appropriate talk page in Nordschleife fastest lap times. X49 (talk) 13:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Laptimes

I am working on making the list of lap times identical to fastlaptimes.com, a reliable source per WP:RS. fastlaptimes.com lists lap times, it considers reliable. Without using a single reliable source for the entire list, it violates WP:SYN. We cannot make decisions as to which times are reliable or not, we have to go by what a single source says. If there are other sources which compile lap times we may have to make multiple lists or not have a list at all, but all of the info I have added is sourced, please do not delete it. You must stop edit warring as you have a long history. --08:32, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikiarrangementeditor, you've been blocked so many times for the same edits. How about you come to the discussion page and actually discuss some of the problems you're having with the article. I think you'll be surprised how much can get accomplished this ways because, I can tell you with great certainty, the edit warring you continue to create is only going to be counterproductive for the article and will more than likely lead to more blocks for you. roguegeek (talk·cont) 09:33, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another 3RR warning

This is a warning that you are about to break the WP:3RR policy, but you don't really need the warning since you're well aware of the policy seeing as though you've been blocked 3 times before for 3RR violations. roguegeek (talk·cont) 00:08, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Nordschleife lap times. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikiarrangementeditor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The American ZR1 fan is crazy. It is frantic with the concealment of inconvenient ZR1 information. I started obstructing only the concealment act fairly. I will explain though it follows the punishment if I violated it about the rule.

Decline reason:

Unblock request doesn't make sense or address the reasons for the block. You have blocked for edit warring before so you know the policy. See WP:GAB — Ѕandahl 20:01, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No personal attacks

This is in response to this, this, and this.

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. roguegeek (talk·cont) 11:28, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I objectively criticized the speech and behavior that you had done.It is necessary to control mean speech and behavior to which you are criticized voluntarily.--Wikiarrangementeditor (talk) 15:12, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing wrong with objecting as long as it falls in line with the policy, which I don't believe it did. That's why the warning is here. roguegeek (talk·cont) 18:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good faith

This warning is in response to your accusations directed to me of being a GM employee, a ZR1 fanboy, or general GM fan and that I edit with all of that in mind. For me, personally, I'm not a fan of the ZR1. Just assume good faith when you edit. I'm here to improve articles that don't conform to policy.

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. roguegeek (talk·cont) 18:58, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User block notice

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Nürburgring lap times. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Stifle (talk) 08:55, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

I have opened a discussion regarding your continued edit warring at WP:ANI. --Leivick (talk) 18:22, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I have blocked you for tendentious editing. You were recently blocked and on return have resumed precisely the same behaviour, so there is no expiry time on this block. When you feel you are ready to resume editing in a collaborative manner, and have indicated that you understand the problem with your past behaviour, you may use {{unblock}} to request unblocking. Note that these are the minimum conditions that are likely to be necessary before an admin will consider unblocking you at this point. Guy (Help!) 19:40, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Advertisement nissangtr us.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:27, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]