User talk:Wikianon2023
Blank
[edit] Wikianon2023 (talk) 22:05, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
About "independent panels"
[edit]Hi there...you recently stated that "in light of my recent comments I would be perpetually investigated by an independent panel". Why was this account just created now? If you have a problem with me, maybe try to resolve it peacefully first on my talk page before going to "an independent panel" or even ANI. It doesn't help that you've left a plea for the recently retired editor TheScrubby to return, so I find it very difficult to WP:AGF behind this account. Can you tell me more about who is made up of the independent panel, the exact comments of mine which justify this "investigation", and under what authority does the panel justify itself? It would be a much smarter idea to bring this up with maybe WP:ANI or the Arbitration Committee instead of with "an independent panel".
On a side note, in the original discussion leading to Jim's TBAN, I opposed a TBAN for TheScrubby, so it doesn't make sense. Probably time to WP:DROPTHESTICK against whatever vendetta you have. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 22:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
- You are the subject of an inquiry into your ethics, and possible witness intimidation, favouritism, and attempted trial in absentia. The result of such a report will not be known to you until after a long time. It could possibly outlast your time as an editor on Wikipedia. Wikianon2023 (talk) 23:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
Notice of an ANI discussion involving you
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
You can view the discussion at Wikipedia:ANI#User:Wikianon2023. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 23:55, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
February 2023
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. RickinBaltimore (talk) 00:12, 20 February 2023 (UTC)