User talk:Wikiacc97

Welcome!

Hello, Wikiacc97, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 19:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with the "please add criticism"

If you aren't going to do some of the work yourself, eg find reliable sources that meet WP:RS (ie not blogs or personal websites, preferably academic works) it's unlikely anyone will. Don't add empty sections, and don't expect people to add criticism sections. See Wikipedia:Criticism. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 14:50, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Wikiacc97 (talk) 04:00, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add criticism sections such as the ones at Atheism and Criticism of atheism

When you have added criticism sections yourself recently, per User:Doug Weller above, it hasn't gone well. The fact that well-known bad men, guilty of atrocities, were not atheists does not constitute a criticism of atheism, nor does it refute any criticism of atheism. Was this your train of thought?

Hitler was evil.
Hitler was not an atheist.
Therefore, atheism does not make people evil.

Or something similar? If so, please read and take on board the Fallacy of the undistributed middle before you add any more criticism sections. Bishonen | talk 10:08, 14 February 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Sorry Wikiacc97 (talk) 03:59, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Doug Weller talk 15:16, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]