User talk:Wiki Wistah/Newspaper articles
Starting fresh
[edit]Thanks for all your comments, Tobogganoggin, IvoShandor, jtowns, and, of course, the countless millions who saw this page and chose not to comment because they knew I did it perfectly the first time. Or at least that's what I tell myself.
I finally took a minute to incorporate some of your ideas into a second draft (cleverly labeled "2nd draft"). Accordingly, I moved the first draft to an archive (cleverly placed in a subpage called "/d1") and blanked this page so you can tear apart the new version. Have fun, and really, THANK YOU for being part of this. ``` W i k i W i s t a h W a s s a p ``` 04:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- looks fine to me. jtowns 21:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'd word it that newspaper companies owning more than 2 newspapers in different markets are notable. At least the more in different markets part.. If they bought up both newspapers of a city and continue to publish them then aren't themselves notable. DGG (talk) 23:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Notability section
[edit]This section is not secure. There is a new essay being created at the moment, Wikipedia:Notability (media), which is attempting to create a consensual guideline to newspaper notability. Input is welcome. SilkTork *SilkyTalk 14:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:NART" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Wikipedia:NART has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 22 § Wikipedia:NART until a consensus is reached. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 23:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)