User talk:WikiThatDrew

Hello, WikiThatDrew! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Petrb (talk) 20:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Unbundling edits

Drew, you are making progress in adding substantive material to the unbundling article. JMB — Preceding unsigned comment added by JMBauer (talk • contribs) 21:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from Johannes M. Bauer

You made some good edits to the telecommunications section. The edits could mention that unbundling was more narrowly construed since 2003, essentially limited to local loops. Prior to 2003, switching and other network elements were also included but the FCC found that they did not meet the standards required by the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (to pass "necessity" and "impairment" tests). These loops are often priced using TELRIC (Total Element Long Run Incremental Costs), an incremental costs standard. --JMBauer (talk) 22:16, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback by JM Bauer on Antenna Structure Regulation

This is a substantive piece of work. I was surprise to see the note on top of the page. Am not sure how/why if was added. Could you please consult your online ambassador to get some feedback? This is an area that I do not know in detail but it seems that you pulled together factual information on a legitimate topic. --JMBauer (talk) 20:18, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Antenna Structure Registration for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Antenna Structure Registration is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Antenna Structure Registration until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

I am sorry for nominating your article, but it is not quite encyclopedic. Renata (talk) 20:04, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]