User talk:WikiRank

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 11:26, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiRank (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, I won't do it again WikiRank (talk) 11:48, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What will you do instead? How specifically will you avoid WP:COI? What would you like your username changed to, to comply with WP:USERNAME? Yamla (talk) 11:51, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiRank (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only wanted to add my interest to the descrpition (for example User:K6ka used external links). Now I know, that description can not have external sources. WikiRank (talk) 11:54, 27 September 2019 (UTC) Please also unblock the IP address- this is static IP of the university. WikiRank (talk) 12:07, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not proposed a new username, and this request does not convince me that you understand what you did wrong and will act differently in the future. Since you won't be allowed to edit about WikiRank, what will you edit about instead? I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 12:40, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So far, you have refused to explain how specifically you will avoid WP:COI and you have refused to pick a new username. In your next edit, you must address these. If you are unwilling to do so, there's nothing more to be done here and I'll revoke access to your talk page. --Yamla (talk) 12:22, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, if it is necessary, please change the username to Rank2019.--WikiRank (talk) 12:41, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is not acceptable either, please choose something that indicates an individual is operating this account(your real name is not required). 331dot (talk) 12:41, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, but there are examples of suh user names: User:K6ka. Maybe Wirank?--WikiRank (talk) 12:45, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you insist on having "WikiRank" or a variation of that in your username, it must be in the format of "Username of WikiRank". 331dot (talk) 12:47, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) I'm concerned. If you think K6ka is an unacceptable username and if you think Wirank is an acceptable username, you may lack sufficient competence to edit here. Pick a username unrelated to your website. Unrelated. Nothing to do with your website. Something completely different. (or follow 331dot's advice) --Yamla (talk) 12:47, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Best of WikiRank? --WikiRank (talk) 12:54, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Is there something about what we are asking that you don't understand? 331dot (talk) 12:57, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, but if this username is not good, I can think about another --WikiRank (talk) 13:01, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user has also not addressed WP:COI. If their next edit does not address WP:COI and does not pick an acceptable username, or alternatively does not answer your question, I'm revoking talk page access. We require a level of capability this user is singularly failing to demonstrate. WikiRank, take the time to read WP:COI and WP:USERNAME. --Yamla (talk) 13:02, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your choice of username should not contain "WikiRank" or any variation of that, unless it is part of a larger username that indicates a specific individual is using this account, such as "JohnDoe of WikiRank". You don't need to use your actual name, use an alias or otherwise make up a name. 331dot (talk) 13:05, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]