User talk:WikiNic-Creator

Igor Morales moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Igor Morales, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 22:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

David Lecumberri moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, David Lecumberri, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NagalimNE (talk) 10:57, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Trevino moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sophia Trevino, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NagalimNE (talk) 11:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello WikiNic-Creator! Your additions to Shmuel Halkin have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 14:39, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of @NYT first said

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on @NYT first said requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Adano (association)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adano (association) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 19:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CANAE

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CANAE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 19:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Isabella Grullón Paz

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Isabella Grullón Paz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bbb23 (talk) 19:55, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, blocked?

How could I be blocked? Come on! I don't understand nothing...WikiNic-Creator (talk) 20:27, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiNic-Creator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I f****** don't know why or how I got blocked. I don't understand. Is this a collaborative Wikipedia? I joined in 2017 and I can't understand nothing why I got blocked... My godness WikiNic-Creator (talk) 20:27, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request, but you were blocked as a sock of Remitbuber (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Bbb23 (talk) 20:33, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I just contacted with Wikimedia friends. User:David Eppstein, why did you blocked me? I am amazed in your capacity to get stressed. You block me because I create "random" articles and you have a personal article David Eppstein........

As Bbb23 says above, you were blocked for sockpuppetry and block evasion, and specifically as a sockpuppet of Remitbuber. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:38, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, yes. I am Remibuber (or as it is written) ((irony). I wish you all disapear from Wikipedia to make Wikipedia a safer place. You pretend to create knowledge and you constructed the less reliable place on world. You always disturb people. I JOINED IN 2017 AND I AM HERE TO CREATE THINGS WITH SOURCE: STOP BLOCKING: I'LL TAKE INMEDIATE ACTIONS IF YOU DON'T STOP. Let me create articles and then you give your f********* opinion.......

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiNic-Creator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi! I have been blocked because I am a sockpupet of Remitbuber. I yesterday logged in to my acc WikiNic-Creator and we both instantly got blocked. It says that I only create articles about "Spanish mathematics Olympiad contestants". Well. That's not a good argument. What if needed, it has relevance, and I want to take part in Wikipedia? I admire the Google Information Graph and I'd like to use it. But, if you try to delete all time that type of articles, come on, knowledge dissapear because this Wikipedia would be elitist. I have been crying for hours (this is not an argument for appealing my block, I remark it because I know it may sound like) and when I get blocked trying to edit about what I know, what I like, what I live for.... which is mathematics and actual staff, I get sad. Just as an example, check, Boccia at the 2020 Summer Paralympics, a sport who (at least me) didn't know, has a Wikipedia entry for 2020 Summer Olympics, and 2022 International Congress of Mathematicians don't have. If it was for me, I would create 1 000 of articles about the 2022 ICM, like the Spanish participation at ICM 2022, Russian participation, Slovenian, Italian... Because it has reliable sources (all the universities who send people to the congress and some media articles), but, maybe, is not appropiate. So, why when i create the 2022 ICM I got blocked? I would like to be unblocked, and not only that, I want to delete the discussion with Remitbuber, the "sockpuppetry" with Remitbuber. I don't care if then I take a headache trying to create math actual articles, it's my fight, my social movement, my activism right now. As soon as I get unblocked, I will create a new account, with my REAL name, I will create this articles and just follow wikipedia rules for creation. I'll do with AfD, and when I have 10 edits and 4 days of historical contributions, I will pass to create at a normal article. Writing this is for me a challenge. This night, I had nightmares, and still now I am crying because I don't know how, after 10!!!! hours of creating nice articles on Wikipedia, reading like for 3, searching for 5, writing precisely, erasing, rewriting, 3 users decided to delete ALL my work, I got blocked, I am wrong, and, as "I create about math actual stuff", I am reBLOCKED. If this is not enough, I will never understand what's the "COLLABORATIVE" wikipedia. Ahsh! thank you and hope I can have an answer, which is NO, but a comment from more than 1 person is added. Thank you again! 81.42.241.27 (talk) 07:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)WikiNic-Creator (talk) 15:34, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The checkuser tool connfirms you are Remitbuber. PhilKnight (talk) 16:28, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(they told me I have to do this in this account)

I've revoked TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:21, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]