User talk:WikiDima

Welcome

Hey WikiDima, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially to the discussion at Social sciences article. Sometimes editors change, revert, and dispute edits, if you ever feel like any of your contributions have been misunderstood, or if you would like to talk about what you think an article needs, citing your material to good sources and discussing issues at the talk page, as you did at Talk:Social sciences, are the way to go. Even so, feel free to be bold and edit the article directly when your edits aren't likely to be controversial. Anyway, I hope you enjoy working on Wikipedia. Generally new users are directed to read through some of our materials as a sort of introduction. Some good places to browse include, the five pillars of Wikipedia, how to edit a page, how to write a great article, our manual of style, and some key policy pages discuss the importance of subjects of Wikipedia being notable, and having edits be cited to reliable sources. Also, please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, ask me by email, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Smmurphy^(Talk) 18:07, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Smmurphy for a warm welcome. I did read most of the docs you've mentioned and i've been reading quite a lot about wikipedia, especially since I am getting involved in a study on wikis. However, this is my fist time indeed in getting involved in wiki discussion. I am looking forward to it. Thanks!

WikiDima 18:22, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Best of luck. On WP, welcomes are something of an institution, and generally involve suggesting quite a reading list. From your manners, it was quite clear that you were familiar with the way things work, and so its no surprise that you've read up, so to speak. I don't think that the social sciences article gets a lot of edits, so if the discussion isn't very active, I'd suggest that you feel free be bold. Smmurphy^(Talk) 22:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]