User talk:WikiCreativeJuicer

undisclosed alternate accounts may not participate in internal discussions.

From WP:SOCK in the section titled Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts it says: "Editing project space: Undisclosed alternative accounts are not to be used in discussions internal to the project."

Since it is obvious you have experience here it is clear that this is an alternate account. If you wish to participate in banning discussions or other internal project discussions you must do so through your primary account and not your undisclosed alternate account.

Further violation of this policy will result in a block of this account. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 14:43, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an alternate. I used to edit via IP addresses. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiCreativeJuicer (talk • contribs) 18:22, 27 June 2016‎

You appear to be an alternate account which is generally enough to get you blocked for engaging in inappropriate use of an alternate account. Frankly I don't buy your story and my warning stands. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 18:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well I can't prove a negative

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WikiCreativeJuicer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why was I blocked?

Decline reason:

See WP:DUCK. Your explanation is unconvincing. Huon (talk) 18:43, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you have decided to ignored my warning so I am blocking this account.

None of your edits indicate you are here to build an encyclopedia and all of them indicate that you do have an undisclosed history here. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 18:26, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I said I edited under ip addresses before. I created an account to be more helpful. Should I go back to anonymous editing?

When a brand new account shows up and knows all the back areas of the project and is full of opinions on how things should be it is clear they are not a new user. I politely explained to you our expectation regarding undisclosed alternate accounts and you decided to continue to use it inappropriately. We do allow undisclosed alternate accounts, but not in internal discussions.

If you do have a history here as an IP then you should be able to disclose it by linking to one of your posts. If you don't want to do that for privacy reasons then I understand that. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 18:33, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

if that's what you ou want why not ask for that?

If you are not engaging in sock puppetry please understand that you are engaging in the exact same behaviour that sock puppets engage in and that is why you are being treated like a sock puppet. Specifically showing up seeming to know the place well and jumping directly into internal project discussions.

Most new editors start by editing content in articles because that is the part of Wikipedia that is presented to the public. New users generally don't even know about places like our admin noticeboards, and they certainly don't have enough knowledge of the project to give an opinion on a ban.

The fact is that exactly zero of your contributions are to article space, you are only engaging in internal discussion.

If you have these skills then you must have a past here, if you cannot point to this past then you need to respect our rules for undisclosed alternate accounts. If you want me to unblock you I would want you to first either link your current account to your old one or agree to follow the restrictions we place on alternate accounts. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 18:40, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I edited the Tim Walz article under this IP address. Let me find more. I don't remember what pages I edited or discussions I was in.

An IP that was blocked for block evasion. HighInBC ^{Need help? {{ping|HighInBC}}} 02:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]