User talk:WikiCentral24/Archives/2022/August

Message no. 1 from Pppery

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to User talk:49.144.72.74. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 13:47, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Message no. 2 from Hariboneagle927

Please stop including Kris Aquino as First Lady in the infobox, I'm aware that the role is not reserved for spouses but reliable sources has said that Benigno Aquino III had no First Lady at all. Inquirer (2014), Rappler (2016), ABS-CBN (2022). The only instance that Kris Aquino was mentioned to be as "de facto" First Lady is for the 2015 APEC Summit plus "The sisters Noynoy Aquino leaves behind" mentions as "Ballsy, Pinky, Kris, and Viel remained in the public eye, taking turns in performing First Lady duties." Do we list all of them in the First Lady roster?

If you dispute this still, please raise this on the Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 18:58, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Message no. 3 from InvadingInvader

Hello, I'm InvadingInvader. I noticed that you recently removed content from Legislative districts of Bulacan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. InvadingInvader (talk) 00:53, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Ok first of all, Wikipedia is made for constant changes; no rules have been set in stone and every format here is made to be in continuous evolution. Not only does the redundancy in the old format produce confusion once there are more than 3 districts; more than seven representatives in a specific non-present era; multiple representatives changing districts, but it also negates the purpose of the articles made for the districts. I have defended the format we created as we believe that it is right based on what we saw at the articles: New York's congressional districts and Parliamentary constituencies in London. Noobguy33 ^{(user talk)} 05:33, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Heya, I understand, but please leave an edit summary explaining your changes. This really helps identify vandalism. Btw, your reasoning, while valid, does give me the sense that you haven’t read WP:OWN, which essentially says that neither you nor a group can claim ownership or act in a manner which hints at ownership of an article. InvadingInvader (talk) 15:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC) InvadingInvader (talk) 15:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

I'm not owning the articles. Noobguy33 ^{(user talk)} 22:44, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Message no. 4 from Itsquietuptown

Hello, I noticed that you reverted the article 2010 Philippine presidential election to its version before April 2022 without an adequate explanation. As stated by InvadingInvader, it would be much more helpful to describe your changes with an accurate edit summary. Thank you. Itsquietuptown ✉️📜 09:59, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, @Itsquietuptown. By the way I just forgot to put an edit summary at that time. I will put an accurate edit summary. And that is why I reverted it it's because the 2010 section was removed. Noobguy33 ^{(user talk)} 10:02, 11 August 2022 (UTC)