User talk:Wiki6995
| This is Wiki6995's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1 |
The file File:India Today, Cover Image, May 2023.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free magazine cover being used in a WP:DECORATIVE manner in Supriyo v. Union of India#Commentary which fails WP:NFCC#8. Non-free magazine covers are generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about the magazines or the magazine issues they represent, but their use in other articles or in othre ways is generally only allowed when the cover itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use. There is no such commentary for this particular cover anywhere in the article, and the only mention of it or the two persons appearing on it is in the caption provided for the image; so, there's no significant loss of encyclopedic value to the reader of the "Commentary" section suffered by not seeing this particular magazine cover.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:56, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly, I agree with on the issues you have raised. However, I would appreciate further clarification. The magazine cover is believed to be the first instance of magazine using photograph of a same-sex couple in their cover page in India. I concede that I was unable to find the source to support the claim it is the first instance. I believed this was relevant because the mainstream media discussing queer relationships increased exponential during the case, and this image would be illustrative of queer relationships being part of public discourse in an unprecedented manner. Given this reasoning, due to think the use of magazine cover would be appropriate? If yes, what information or citation should be added to support its use? Wiki6995 (talk) 02:06, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Per WP:VNT, all claims (particularly anything that might possibly seen as contentious and inteerpretative) needs to be supported by a citation to reliable sources for it to not otherwise be considered WP:NOR. Any attempt to self-interpret the significance of the cover is unlikely to be seen as acceptable for Wikipedia's purposes, even in the case of only textual content. So, if you can find some reliable sources that discussed the cover and its significance in some detail and add corresponding content to article, then a case for non-free use could possibly be made; otherwise, I think it will be fairly hard to establish a consensus in favor of the cover's use at WP:FFD, You may of course disagree with this assessment and WP:DEPROD the file; however, (once again) without any sourced critical commentary to support any claims about the cover and its significance, I think the file is almost certainly going to end up deleted via FFD. If you'd like some additional opinions before deciding what to do, you can seek them at either WT:NFCC or WP:MCQ. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for explaining. Wiki6995 (talk) 15:07, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Per WP:VNT, all claims (particularly anything that might possibly seen as contentious and inteerpretative) needs to be supported by a citation to reliable sources for it to not otherwise be considered WP:NOR. Any attempt to self-interpret the significance of the cover is unlikely to be seen as acceptable for Wikipedia's purposes, even in the case of only textual content. So, if you can find some reliable sources that discussed the cover and its significance in some detail and add corresponding content to article, then a case for non-free use could possibly be made; otherwise, I think it will be fairly hard to establish a consensus in favor of the cover's use at WP:FFD, You may of course disagree with this assessment and WP:DEPROD the file; however, (once again) without any sourced critical commentary to support any claims about the cover and its significance, I think the file is almost certainly going to end up deleted via FFD. If you'd like some additional opinions before deciding what to do, you can seek them at either WT:NFCC or WP:MCQ. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:38, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Requested move for Twitter article
[edit]
Your opinion on this issue is requested
You have been tagged to this conversation because you may have previously participated in similar discussions and there has been a notable development. Please consider sharing your views. 𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓔𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻 23:16, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:1st Rainbow Award.png
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:1st Rainbow Award.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science & Technology Logo with Name.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:B.S.Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science & Technology Logo with Name.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:01, 8 November 2024 (UTC)