User talk:Wiki-shield
|
Welcome to the Teahouse Badge |
| Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. | |
| Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to drop one at my talk page!. Happy Editing!
| |
Lumosity
[edit]It is tagged under wikiproject skepticism, so I don't know what your problem is. I've searched and there are reliable sources to criticize it which I'll add in the next few weeks when I'm more available. I don't understand why you have to mindlessly blank criticism of these brain training programs.--Taeyebaar (talk) 05:45, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- I honestly have no idea what you are talking about???Wiki-shield (talk) 10:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- It's also a lie to claim that I never added anything critical of LearningRx when I actually did. If you actually bothered to check the articles history before it got blanked you would see it.--Taeyebaar (talk) 21:06, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 14:33, 23 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Sundayclose (talk) 14:33, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 16:39, 23 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Sundayclose (talk) 16:40, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 18:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Sundayclose (talk) 18:48, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Query
[edit]Do you have any real-life association with Cogmed? Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 00:01, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
- I don't have any formal association with Cogmed. My reasoning is very simple, as a psychotherapist I see many ADHD patients who greatly benefited from Cogmed training. Some were even able to stop medications. Then 3 months ago I noticed how bad the Wikipedia article is and decided to contribute my time to improve it. After realizing what a mess Wikipedia is and how many content manipulations going on here I decided to stay longer and fight for a good cause. Then it developed into a hobby :) Wiki-shield (talk) 10:52, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
In response to the above please see this policy and this policy--Taeyebaar (talk) 19:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Stop
[edit]Stop blanking out reliably sourced sections on Arrowsmith School. If you persist, I will report it here with the link to the AN discussion about you. I don't know where you got the idea that Wiki is not about reliably sourced info, but you are totally wrong, so stop edit warring.--Taeyebaar (talk) 19:13, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
I believe by Wiki-policy I am required to inform you if there is such kind of accusation against you. You are free to defend yourself while the case pends. Thank-you.--Taeyebaar (talk) 02:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Taeyebaar. Wiki-shield (talk) 12:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit] | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Mishash (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 16:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC) |
Regarding Wikipedia Abuse by Editor Taeyebaar
[edit]I believe you are blocked, but please feel free to read the information below and leave comments on this page.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sean Stephens (talk) 19:36, 31 May 2015 (UTC)