User talk:WickyNEMEZIZ
July 2023
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:55, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
WickyNEMEZIZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
all edit is on reliable source and all translated text is by manual，clearly here to help edit not to destructive edit
Decline reason:
If English is not your primary language, you may want to edit the Wikipedia of your primary language. This request does not discuss what was wrong with your editing and what you will do differently. 331dot (talk) 21:54, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I do not accept appeals through email, especially when you have an unblock request here. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 18:17, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
WickyNEMEZIZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
English is my primary language,I have learned Chinese so I did the translation
Decline reason:
The user was not blocked because they reported disruption, as implied below. The user was blocked because they added promotional material to Qihoo 360, accused another editor of "making discriminatory edits against China" and continuously readded material instead of discussing the issue on the talk page. In future unblock requests, please address these concerns and describe why they were inappropriate edits on Wikipedia. Z1720 (talk) 02:06, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Okay, although your initial request was very difficult for me to understand. In any event, that has nothing to do with the reason for your block, it was just a suggestion. You need to discuss what was wrong with your editing and what you will do differently. 331dot (talk) 08:39, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello 331dot,I found a wikipage with one-sided reporting,then I translated the statement from that company into English and edited it on the webpage,there's a user repeatedly undoing my edits using various inappropriate reasons,I issued a warning to him and reported his actions, but then I got banned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WickyNEMEZIZ (talk • contribs)
- @WickyNEMEZIZ: You already have one open unblock request, so while it is still under review, please just post regular comments instead of additional
{{unblock}}s. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 12:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- @WickyNEMEZIZ: You already have one open unblock request, so while it is still under review, please just post regular comments instead of additional
WickyNEMEZIZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, I initially believed that translating and adding an entire company statement into the relevant entry would provide readers with a clearer understanding of the reactions of all individuals involved in the event. Therefore, I did not make any deletions or shortenings. However, this action was mistakenly regarded as corporate promotion. Regarding the other one editor mentioned, based on his editing history, it can be observed that he not only make changes on the Qihoo 360 page but also edit and prevent others from making edits on any pages related to China. WickyNEMEZIZ (talk) 11:21, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Well, I can see why you thought it was worth a try: as far as you knew there might have been a chance that your unblock request would be reviewed by an administrator who is an idiot. It would be just about possible to conceive that you might be so incompetent as to honestly be able to once post a long screed of the company's own marketing hype about itself merely to "provide readers with a clearer understanding of the reactions of all individuals involved in the event", but to do it repeatedly when reverted, and also to repeatedly remove negative material about the company, and expect us to believe that explanation? How is removing negative material helping "understanding of the reactions of all individuals involved in the event"? (My emphasis.) No. You are here for promotional purposes, and denying the glaringly obvious is not going to persuade any administrator that unblocking you would be a good idea. JBW (talk) 21:30, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
WickyNEMEZIZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I don't understand why JBW used such rude rhetoric to question my edits on the page.The source of the text I previously deleted came from a webpage in 2020. I originally intended to update both entries before making edits together. However, each time, another user reverted it back to the previous version directly. I have clearly documented these changes in the edit history.I don't understand why JBW is so adamant in believing that I have a connection with that company. Moreover, I have explained all the issues that have occurred from start to finish. WickyNEMEZIZ (talk) 05:17, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No response to below in 15 days. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
OK, perhaps I was wrong. If so, please explain why your editing of the article consisted substantially of adding promotional material about the company and removing negative material about it. You must be able to see how that would look like a rather big coincidence, to anyone who didn't know your real reasons, so please explain what those real reasons were. If you can give an explanation which looks reasonably plausible then I will withdraw my remarks above. JBW (talk) 18:48, 9 August 2023 (UTC)