User talk:WickedTurth

Your edit isn't entirely unwelcome. As mentioned here, I thought the article could use a contrary viewpoint. However, as this is a contentious issue, such edits should be made with care. They should be well-sourced, no original research and if necessary, reached by consensus. – JBarta (talk) 20:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do not WP:EDITWAR. You are about one inch from being blocked. Before continuing, discuss this on talk and engage with other editors on this matter. – JBarta (talk) 23:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hands up, don't shoot. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. - Mr X 23:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WickedTurth, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi WickedTurth! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:20, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability, not truth

Noticing your userpage, I thought I'd point you towards Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. – JBarta (talk) 20:23, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

the truth should be on Wikipedia.

this page is for all to what wikipedia pages should have more truth in it then having people think it should have.