User talk:Wicked-pedia Editor

Welcome!

Hi Wicked-pedia Editor! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! AngryHarpy‍^talk 10:55, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

GFriend

added links pointing to Japanese and Hyundai

Yuju (singer)

added a link pointing to Suran

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of awards and nominations received by GFriend have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Reason – Non-notable awards, music shows awards, and survey (as the name already say, it's survey not award) should not be included) – Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 05:01, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by GFriend. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Same reason as level 1 warning – Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 07:48, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by GFriend, you may be blocked from editing. Same reason as level 1 warning – Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 08:32, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by GFriend. Reason – Do not include non-notable awards and music shows awards inside the table – Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 09:14, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of awards and nominations received by GFriend. Stop your disruptive editing and vandalism – Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 14:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of awards and nominations received by GFriend shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. EN-Jungwon 14:24, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of awards and nominations received by GFriend; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ashley yoursmile! 14:43, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by GFriend

Hi, please stop your disruptive behavior. The awards you're trying to add to List of awards and nominations received by GFriend is not consider notable awards. In addition, Television music program awards shouldn't be included inside the main table or inside the infobox. They should only be listed inside the group album/EP/single's article that won the award instead. Do note that this is your last warning as final Level 4 warning have been issued to you, please follow the warnings instead of ignoring them. – Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 13:26, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Paper9oll

Hello, Wicked-pedia Editor. You have new messages at Wicked-pedia Editor's talk page.
Message added 13:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

– Paper9oll (📣 • 📝) 13:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Wicked-pedia_Editor reported by User:Ashleyyoursmile (Result: ). Thank you. Ashley yoursmile! 14:54, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 15:32, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Favonian Is it possible for you to semi protect List of awards and nominations received by GFriend‎‎ since this user has been edit warring on that page. EN-Jungwon 15:37, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@EN-Jungwon: That would be pointless as the user is already auto-confirmed. If Wicked-pedia Editor comes out swinging once their present block expires, the next one will likely be indefinite. Favonian (talk) 15:41, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Favonian, Thanks for the reply. I am just worried that this user might create more accounts and start disrupting again. Happy editing EN-Jungwon 15:42, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Gfstudent21 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gfstudent21. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Korean PD Awards

Hello, Wicked-pedia Editor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Korean PD Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:06, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]