User talk:Wibbble

This is Wibbble's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1: 14 days

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by .

Nokia Nseries

Hmm, my bad. I guess I'd mistakenly thought that having worked on the product in question would have given me some form of insight into the matter; didn't realise that this could somehow be construed as malicious. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.231.1.136 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 12 August 2007 (UTC).[reply]

On wikipedia that doesn't actually count for anything - everything should be backed up with references citing reliable sources. After all, there's no proof that anything you say is true. Wibbble 22:46, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nokia N95

STOP DELETING THE LATEST FIRMWARE UPDATE. What is your problem? You ask that it's referenced, yet NONE OF THE OTHER FIRMWARES ARE REFERENCED. Go to Nokia here: http://europe.nokia.com/A4305060 type in the APAC-1 codes that I listed, and see for yourself. Oh, let me see you reference to that page. You know, like the other two firmware updates DIDN'T DO. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.81.24.169 (talk)

Please consider discussing this on the talk page rather than posting incoherent rants here. Wibbble 07:13, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nokia 3220

Instead of creating ever more new articles on "non-notable" phones, we should try to look after the articles alrady existing, like the Nokia 3220. -- Petri Krohn 03:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you've some point to make, just make it. I've created very few articles. Wibbble 22:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nokia E70

An editor has nominated Nokia E70, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia E70 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]