User talk:WhoAteMyButter/2020/December
You are now a Pending Changes Reviewer and Rollbacker!
[edit]Hi WhoAteMyButter! I've been running into you while patrolling logs and recent changes, and I happened to notice that you don't have the rollback or pending changes reviewer user rights. I hope you don't mind, but I went through your contributions and I noticed that you're quite active in recent changes patrolling, and that you consistently view and undo vandalism and bad faith disruption. I believe that these user rights would be useful for you to have and that you'd make good use of both tools. Instead of having you formally request these user rights at WP:PERM, I went ahead and just gave them to you. These user rights allow you to review edits that are pending approval on pages currently under pending changes protection, as well as to quickly revert the edits of other users in cases of blatant vandalism.
- Please keep these things in mind at all times when using rollback to revert edits:
- Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle. It just adds a "[Rollback]" button next to a page's latest edits - that's all. It does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you (obviously).
- Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only, and never used to revert good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose, the rights will be revoked.
- Use common sense. If you're not sure about something, ask.
- Please keep these things in mind at all times when using rollback to revert edits:
- For more information on how to use rollback, see this tutorial page.
- Please keep these things in mind regarding the tools or when you're reviewing any pending changes:
- A list of articles with pending edits awaiting review can be viewed at Special:PendingChanges, and a list of the articles currently under pending changes protection can be viewed at Special:StablePages.
- Being granted and having these rights does not grant you any additional "status" on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you (obviously).
- You'll generally want to accept any pending changes that appear to be legitimate edits and are not blatant vandalism or disruption, and reject edits that are problematic or that you wouldn't accept yourself.
- Never accept any pending changes that contain obvious and clear vandalism, blatant neutral point of view issues, copyright violations, or BLP violations.
- Please keep these things in mind regarding the tools or when you're reviewing any pending changes:
- You may find the following pages useful to review:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline and tutorial on using the rights and reviewing pending changes.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, a summary of pending changes protection, the pending changes user right, and how it applies.
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy section on pending changes protection and its appropriate application and use by administrators.
- You may find the following pages useful to review:
I'm sure you'll do fine with these user rights - they're pretty straight-forward and they don't drastically change the interface that you're used to already. Nonetheless, please don't hesitate to leave me a message on my user talk page if you run into any questions, get stuck anywhere, run into any issues or problems, or if you're not sure if the use of either tool is appropriate or not and need my input or advice - I'll be more than happy to help you any time you need it. If you no longer want one or both of these user rights, let me know and I'll be happy to remove them for you. Thank you for helping to locate, revert, and remove vandalism, as well as review and keep disruptive edits off of Wikipedia - it's a very thankless job to perform and I want you to know that it doesn't go unnoticed and that I appreciate it very much. Happy editing! :-D ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 06:06, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Undid revision 993212745 by Johnchacks (talk)
[edit]hey!.Johnchacks was misusing and added a lot of wrong info !.I have added citations to whatever i have uploaded on wiki ..hope you correct it thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Right.editsgold (talk • contribs) 15:00, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Citra (emulator)
[edit]BTW release info is located at Template:Latest_preview_software_release/Citra
It may be useful to read up on this: Template:Infobox_software#Moving_release_data_outside_the_article
You can access this page from reading mode by clicking on the [±] link.
Nathanielcwm (talk) 13:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Is it Good to Continue Having 404 Pages as "SOURCE" on Wikipedia?
[edit]Hi There, Why the Changes were reverted? The "Source" is currently 404 and is taking to the readers to NoWhere. So, is that correct to continue having a 404 Page on Wikipedia or its better to add a good and informative resource by replacing the Broken Link? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravinder3790 (talk • contribs) 03:04, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- It cites a blog and thus fails WP:RS. Given that I'd prefer to find an archive of the original rather than replace it with an advertisement, I reverted. WhoAteMyButter (📨│📝) 05:57, 21 December 2020 (UTC)