User talk:Whitmarewood

Give up Sunholm, move on from Willy on Wheels related vandalism. Just accept the pages are deleted and focus on other edits rather than vandal cults. 195.188.152.12 09:27, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whitmarewood (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Just because I know User:TheM62Manchester doesn't mean I'm obsessed with vandals; nor is he; and he isn't WoW, I CAN VERIFY THAT. Pgk, why do you always assume the worst?

Decline reason:

Troll go home --Doc 12:07, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whitmarewood (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I can assure you I'm not a troll, and theM62Manchester isn't; he isn't a reincarnation of any user, and I want to know if we can make a fresh start

Decline reason:

As Sunholm/Sunfazer etc. all editing from the same IP all saying it's all sorted no more vandalism etc. etc. how many "fresh start"s are required?

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Whitmarewood (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is a genuine apology for Sunholm, and I can guarantee NO MORE VANDALISM. I just emailed Sunfazer now, and he told me he's using different IPs now, and wants to say sorry. Would anyone be prepared to forgive?? He accepts wiki vandalism is not good, and wants help, as it says blocks are preventative rather than punitive in the policy. This is genuine, would you be prepared to help? Oh, and finally, I am not obsessed with Willy on Wheels or vandals. Please forgive me, and Sunholm, and m62manchester and everyone else.

Decline reason:

see below

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Heard it all before you'll never guess that user was blocked for page move vandalism too. --pgk^(talk) 12:19, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]