User talk:Whiteworks3

Hello Whiteworks. Why do you keep changing your username? Smalljim 19:59, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I keep whiteworks but I can't seem to keep to the single number. I would edit under simply whiteworks, the name of my house, if I could.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Whiteworks3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! — iridescent 22:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

This will be the only warning you receive, as you have been warned on your other accounts - the next time you insert original research and/or material in violation of the neutral point of view policy, as you did on Janner and Plymouth City Airport, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You will also be blocked if you make another username to keep making these sorts of edits. --Core desat 23:07, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I feel very chastened but I would like you to meet some of the many people who use the term which is causing you such angst over the airport. These include members of the company who own the site.I have quite recently seen the term in material published and used by local taxi firms who service the airport and have heard it on flights and among local businessmen returning from London.Are you local. perhaps you could come and talk to us.

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Prince Edward, Earl of Wessex. Thank you.Nilf anion (talk) 15:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Prince Michael of Kent. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nilf anion (talk) 16:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A friendly suggestion

Blimey, Whiteworks! You'll get yourself blocked really quickly if you carry on making edits like those you have today. Can I offer a strong but friendly recommendation? Take some time off from editing and read up on Wikipedia's policies - starting with the big three content policies: Verifiability, Neutral point of view and No original research. Reading Biographies of living persons would be a very good idea too. I know you have a lot to contribute to Wikipedia, but you do need to ensure that you do it in the proper fashion. Best wishes —SMALL JIM 18:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plymouth College

Please stop deleting Category:Plymouth from the article. It is a perfectly acceptable category for an institution located within the city. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]