Jump to content

User talk:Whitejay251

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for leaving messages for User:Whitejay251.

  • Please remember to sign your message. Typing four tildes after your comment ( ~~~~ ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which is very helpful.
  • Place messages that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A Descriptive Header==.
  • If I respond to your message it will be on your talk page, I'd appreciate if you would respond to any of my messages here.
  • I reserve the right to reformat your message for readability and to remove redlinks.
  • I will also remove vandalism and obtrusive nonsense.
Archive
Archives
  1. August 2005 – January 2006
    Wikibreak: December 26 2005March 3 2006
  2. March 2006 – October 2006
    Wikibreak: October 23 2006December 30 2006
    Wikibreak: June 18 2007August 12 2007
    Wikibreak: September 28 2007March 26 2008

Re:Message at User talk:Whitejay 251/DEP holdovers

[edit]

Please see my message at User talk:Whitejay 251/DEP holdovers. Kathleen.wright5 00:27, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Whitejay251

[edit]

I am IoWiki2007, and I love Boxing. I think that this article Super-cruiserweight can be improved for good a lot. What about if we create a list of all the Super-cruiserweight champions (of course, every boxing entities that only reclaim them) for once and all? We may actualize this page more. I will need your help. ~~Io_Wiki2007~~ 16:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Unified orphan/de-orphan process

[edit]

You might be interested in this discussion.--Aervanath's signature is boring 22:03, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at project talk page

Invitation to Meetup/Seattle6, a focus group

[edit]

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Wikipedia. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Wikipedia, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you.

I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Wikipedia in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided. Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration. Your contribution will be greatly appreciated!

Willing and able to help us out? RSVP here. Want to know more? Visit our user talk page . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! Commprac01 (talk) 01:49, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Phil Morrison (driver)

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Phil Morrison (driver), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

BLP unsourced for more than 2 years.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Mr.Z-man 21:16, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NEW CATEGORY PAGE

[edit]

Hello Washington-user!! What do you think of this category?
Either on a scale of 1-10 or with commentary.
Let me know through the "Special:EmailUser/" section. #TTiT# 13:07, 14 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by The-Traveller-in-Tacoma (talkcontribs)

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Whitejay251! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Art Chantry - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Klaus Beer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:18, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:07, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Whitejay251. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Whitejay251. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Whitejay251. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sterling Award for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sterling Award is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sterling Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:48, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article International Comics and Animation Festival has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (events) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:48, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedia:Moderator" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:Moderator. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 29#Wikipedia:Moderator until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Aasim (talk) 11:45, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Tennis rankings templates

[edit]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current ATP singles rankings

[edit]

Template:Current ATP singles rankings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Qwerty284651 (talk) 05:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current ATP doubles individual rankings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Qwerty284651 (talk) 05:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Current WTA singles rankings

[edit]

Template:Current WTA singles rankings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Qwerty284651 (talk) 05:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current WTA doubles individual rankings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Qwerty284651 (talk) 05:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding some content you added to Woodbine, Maryland

[edit]

@Whitejay251: I doubt you'll see this, but I was wondering your source for the information you provided in the Woodbine article, where you mentioned that the road was paved only in the 1960s. Thank you! —  Melofors  TC 10:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article International Comic Arts Forum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability concerns have not been addressed for 2 1/2 years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]