User talk:White Shadows/Archive 14
This is an archive of past discussions about User:White Shadows. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |
Hi
In regards to your oppose at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Eagles247 I'd like to point out that the user has 2 GAs and Nine DYKs, I really think you should revise your vote. Regards, —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 10:12am • 00:12, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Tegetthoff and Sokol
I've got most of the B1 stuff done, which would be the main opposition point in a GA. Mind sprinkling Sokol (which means Eagle, of all things, in Russian) onto this girl? Buggie111 (talk) 23:21, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- I'll see what I can do?
- Do you think she GAC worthy now? I do. Buggie111 (talk) 00:44, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Can you add in a characteristics section, mentioning both the Hungarian ships' stats and the other three? Please do that above the construction section and that I'll give it the go ahead for a GAN :)--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 00:56, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Buggie111 (talk) 01:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- -Take a look at the article now. I'm all done and heading to bead. You can nominate it for us now :)--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 01:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- The Karl class passed GA. If you want, you can co-nom the ship articles. Buggie111 (talk) 13:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- Co-nom? I did like 80% of Tegetthoff! Sure, I'll "co-nom". Thanks :P--22:42, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- The Karl's, not Tegetthoff. Buggie111 (talk) 00:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oh sure. I'm gonig to be very buisy soon. I'm heading to Rome in a week but I'll help :)--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 21:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- I've got the lead done on the main ship, and am about to nominate. Buggie111 (talk) 21:43, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Wait, you'll need to fix up the bare URLs and trim the characteristics section.--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 21:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- I've got the lead done on the main ship, and am about to nominate. Buggie111 (talk) 21:43, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Oh sure. I'm gonig to be very buisy soon. I'm heading to Rome in a week but I'll help :)--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 21:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- The Karl's, not Tegetthoff. Buggie111 (talk) 00:39, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Co-nom? I did like 80% of Tegetthoff! Sure, I'll "co-nom". Thanks :P--22:42, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- The Karl class passed GA. If you want, you can co-nom the ship articles. Buggie111 (talk) 13:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
- -Take a look at the article now. I'm all done and heading to bead. You can nominate it for us now :)--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 01:52, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Buggie111 (talk) 01:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Can you add in a characteristics section, mentioning both the Hungarian ships' stats and the other three? Please do that above the construction section and that I'll give it the go ahead for a GAN :)--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 00:56, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Do you think she GAC worthy now? I do. Buggie111 (talk) 00:44, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
Sure, will do. Buggie111 (talk) 21:59, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Can you also nominate the Tegetthoffs at GTC? I've got to get to work on my AP English homework :)--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 22:00, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sure. I love early release... Buggie111 (talk) 22:03, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 October 2010
- WikiProject report: Hot topics with WikiProject Volcanoes
- Features and admins: Milestone: 2,500th featured picture
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Code reviewers, October Engineering update, brief news
Something for you
Military history reviewers' award | ||
By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your good work helping with the WikiProject's Peer and A-Class reviews for the period 1 April-30 September 2010, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award. Roger Davies talk 08:21, 7 October 2010 (UTC) Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste |
Gee, thanks!--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 21:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
For future reference
Saving this edit summary here, as well as the follow-up for future reference.--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 02:09, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
GTC nom
Thanks for noming all of them for a GTC. I was too tired to continue. Buggie111 (talk) 13:53, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- First, Happy Columbus Day! SEcond, WE have some problems at the GTC. I suggest you bring Sokol out for the Monarch's. Buggie111 (talk) 17:05, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 October 2010
- News and notes: Board resolutions, fundraiser challenge, traffic report, ten thousand good articles, and more
- In the news: Free culture conference, "The Register" retracts accusations, students blog about Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Smithsonian Institution
- Features and admins: Big week for ships and music
- Dispatches: Tools, part 3: Style tools and wikEd
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
FAC Lineup
Assuming that the Monarch's aren't included, we have to have 10 out of 19 articles at FA/L, with the remainder at GA. The Habsburgs have not been able to pass an ACR, so they have to stay at GA. I think the same thing goes for the Karls. That leaves us with the Karl and Habsburg class articles, all of the Radetzkys and Tegetthoffs and the Ersatz Monarch. Three of these can be at GA class. I would have gone for two of the less active Tegetthoffs and Ersatz Monarch, but I"m not sure on what your position is. I'd love ot get all of them to FA, but I have a feeling that articles like Prinz Eugen won't pass. With that in mind, should I nom Zrinyi for an ACR? Buggie111 (talk) 01:47, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Zrinyi can go for an ACR. I'm sure that the class article as well as 2 of the Tegetthoffs can make FAC. The class article for Radetzky as well as the ship itself can make FAC as well. There is quite a bit of info on her from Sokol. That means that (number crunching) 6 articles, (The list, EFF, Tegetthoff, 2 Tegetthoff BBs, Radetzky-class and the Radetzky itself) could be FA candidates easily, so we need a further four. Any ideas?--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 01:52, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- Zrinyi(she was about as active as EFF) Ersatz Monarch (if we can get Tom, Ed, Strum or Parsec to help us with the whole uncompleted ship thing), KArl or Habsburg class articles, maybe both, and maybe we could try to get another Tegetthoff to FA (I'm thiking Virbius Unitus, Szent Istvan and the more active of the other two.) Also, if we both have one FAC that only one of us works on and one co-nom, and that all of the articles listed are FAC quality, this will take six weeks. Could we also take a look at Sevastopol somewhere in the middle of that? I'd like to see her get to FA. Buggie111 (talk) 02:01, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- SMS Tegetthoff is also a good idea. Szent Istvan could certainly pass an ACR and an FAC. I'd lay off the class articles for Habsburg and the Karls as they too are not that "worthy" of an FA. I'm going to bed now and I'm going to be in Rome from Thursday to Monday and I'll be so jet-lagged when I get back at like 11:00 PM on Monday that I'm likely going to need to take Tuesday off from Wikipedia. I'll talk to Strum about Szent Istvan and you go ahead and nominate Zrinyi after getting someone like Parsec to look it over. Goodnight :)--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 02:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- You should take a look at the German Pre-Dread's and their class articles. PArsec goes in-depth in those and could help us. Good Night. Buggie111 (talk) 02:30, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- I've decided to hold off on Zrinyi until you come back due to good old Sokol. Remember to cite it when you return. And try to find some sources on Italian pre-dreads when you are there, if you have any time available. Have fun on your trip! Buggie111 (talk) 02:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
- You should take a look at the German Pre-Dread's and their class articles. PArsec goes in-depth in those and could help us. Good Night. Buggie111 (talk) 02:30, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
DYK nomination of SMS Budapest
Hello! Your submission of SMS Budapest at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Rlevse • Talk • 23:25, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 October 2010
- News and notes: Wikipedia fundraiser event, Frankfurt book fair, news in brief
- WikiProject report: Show Me the Money: WikiProject Numismatics
- Features and admins: A week for marine creatures
- Dispatches: Common issues seen in Peer review
- Arbitration report: Climate change case closes after 4 months
- Technology report: Video subtitling tool, staff vs. volunteer developers, brief news
DYK for SMS Budapest
On 21 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article SMS Budapest, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Sevastopol
Thanks for the help. I'd be on, but other more major things are happening. You'll be getting credit for the GA. Buggie111 (talk) 14:09, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Don't mention it. I wasn't looking for credit for the GA in the first place, I was only trying to help :)--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 20:32, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry about the whole GA credit thing. I was expecting you to do more, so that's why I mentioned credit. Buggie111 (talk) 15:04, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- NP. Just think of it as help. Now can you get over to EFF's FAC so that I'm not the only one editing it!--White Shadows Your guess is as good as mine 16:17, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry about the whole GA credit thing. I was expecting you to do more, so that's why I mentioned credit. Buggie111 (talk) 15:04, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Communicat
Thank you for trying to offer some good advice to Communicat on the RfAr board. He doesn't seem interested in listening.[1] Edward321 (talk) 04:48, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LV (September 2010)
|
The results of September's coordinator elections, plus ongoing project discussions and proposals |
|
|
|
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 20:46, 23 October 2010 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 25 October 2010
- News and notes: Mike Godwin leaves the Foundation, ArbCom election announced
- In the news: Good faith vs. bad faith, climate change, court citations, weirdest medieval fact, brief news
- WikiProject report: Nightmare on Wiki Street: WikiProject Horror
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- ArbCom interview: So what is being an arbitrator actually like?
- Arbitration report: Case closes within 1 month
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Ping
Check your email. Parsecboy (talk) 23:22, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
Smile!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
SabrinaMagers talk sign 15:57, 18 17:03, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Your sieg (not sure I've misspelled sig)
There's nothing wrong with it. Obviously some have too much time on their hands.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:20, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions about User:White Shadows. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |