Jump to content

User talk:WhiteKnightLeo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, WhiteKnightLeo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! — Ched (talk) 07:27, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Hi WhiteKnightLeo

[edit]

What article are you having a problem with? — Ched (talk) 07:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See my post on Someguy's talk page. A link should be in my contributions. I'd rather not talk about it here on my talk page, for reasons that will become obvious once you've read it. WhiteKnightLeo (talk) 07:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a bit of information to go through. I tend to agree with you, it might be best not to throw any fuel on the fire at the moment. There are several Admins. involved, and usually when that happens, things work out for the best. They may get on little ego trips from time to time, even argue with each other - but in the end, they do a pretty good job at working for the common good of Wikipedia. Someguy's got a lot more time in here than me, so he may be able to provide some advise once he's read through the stuff too. I'll read through more of this over the next couple days, and get back to you if I think of anything that could help. — Ched (talk) 08:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Normally, you'd be right, but these admins are friends of that trouble-causing user, which is why so many people have been banned. Also, it looks like they don't seem to be properly doing their jobs. If another user harassed people the way that person has, they'd have been banned, but he's barely received a warning. It's terrible. WhiteKnightLeo (talk) 08:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR

[edit]

Hello, I would like to inform you that you are now in violation of WP:3RR on the article Umineko no Naku Koro ni, which could get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you continue reverting the article, you will be blocked. This is a warning.--十八 06:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a warning-it's a threat. I asked you very nicely to stop reverting my edits until the discussion had come to a conclusion, but you refused. The anime noticeboard discussion YOU started even supports my changes. You're just trying to own the page. WhiteKnightLeo (talk) 06:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Umineko no Naku Koro ni. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Farix (Talk) 06:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is not fair. A discussion WAS going on, and it is only respectable to leave the article as-is until a decision had been reached. I pointed this out and politely asked that the article be left alone, but those bullies continued to edit it. The seperate discussion posted on the anime noticeboard support my edits, stating that while spoilers are not a bad thing, excessive spoilers are, and they should not be included in the article if not necessary. Perhaps you should read the discussion before you revert edits and claim falsely that I was removing things solely because of spoilers. WhiteKnightLeo (talk) 06:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WhiteKnightLeo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hate to say this, but this block is a sham. Luna's claim that Checkuser says I share an IP with TheBrokenSky and AkariKanzaki is a lie. Though she is playing dumb, my account was created AFTER the IPs of both accounts had been blocked indefinitely. From what I understand, they are still blocked now, and the block on them was never removed. Thus, it is impossible that I could have registered with either of their IPs or edited with them. Luna is lying to back up her friend Erigu's false accusations against me.

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's interesting, though, since I blocked one IP TheBrokenSky and AkariKanzaki were using... you've repeatedly insisted that you're on a different IP, and so that block shouldn't impact your ability to edit, and yet here you are requesting unblocking. Sure you don't want to amend your story a bit? – Luna Santin (talk) 07:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. There is nothing wrong with what I'm saying. You are lying. And it's obvious. The IPs of both of those users have already been blocked for a while. When they were blocked, they were blocked indefinitely. That means, there is no way I was ever posting with those IPs. The IP you have blocked is no doubt the one belonging to me alone. WhiteKnightLeo (talk) 07:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And the proof:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3A76.120.154.208

As you can see, the only time my IP address has been blocked is just now, by you. And yet, you still claim my IP matches those two users? But that's impossible, since then there would be a record of it having been blocked at least twice before. WhiteKnightLeo (talk) 07:20, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then how come there is no block record in this account's block log? If Luna renewed the blocks on the IPs and your account has been blocked at the same time, then that's a clear sign that you are from one of those two IPs. --Farix (Talk) 07:22, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what it is you are trying to say. My point is, if my IP were really the same as the one used by either of those two users, like Luna claims, then her blockage of my IP just now would not be the only thing in the log. It's proof that she is lying. WhiteKnightLeo (talk) 07:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WhiteKnightLeo&oldid=1142692555"