User talk:Whichvisions

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Whichvisions, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Stuartyeates (talk) 23:08, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Whichvisions (talk) 19:30, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Whichvisions!

Hi Whichvisions! Thanks for coordinating an event for WikiWomen's History Month! I am trying to gather information on a few things for a summary I'm writing about the month! It'd be great to know the following information, if possible:

How many participants did the event have?
How many new editors created accounts? (A list of editors would be awesome!)
Is it possible that all of the article and contribution outcomes can be shared on the WWHM outcomes page?

Any thoughts you can share about successes, participant experience, lessons learned, things one wishes they would have done differently, ways WMF and chapters can support these events, and so forth, would be wonderful. Thank you so much and all you do for improving women's representation and participation in Wikipedia. Sarah (talk) 19:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sarah! I hope you will get notified of this reply.

How many participants did the event have? There were about 13-15 of us in all.
How many new editors created accounts? I will need to ask User:Mwacha, but I think maybe 6-7
Is it possible that all of the article and contribution outcomes can be shared on the WWHM outcomes page? We didn't stick very strictly to the Women's History Project guidelines. While we encouraged people to try out articles on the history of women's health, the main creations were:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barnard_Center_for_Research_on_Women
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1982_Barnard_Conference_on_Sexuality
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholar_and_Feminist_Online (ahhh, the notability is being called into question, have to figure out how to respond to that!)

I'm hoping mwacha will write up a summary post, but we're planning on continuing to host these events and really enjoyed it! For me, one big challenge is balancing wanting people to "be bold" with worrying that people will be discouraged if their work is removed or questioned. Also balancing all the standards and technical details with the process of actual editing of information. Whichvisions (talk) 19:39, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Whichvisions! For future note, to let someone know that you replied to their talk page comment, you can drop off a talkback template on their talk page. I added your page to my watch list, but not everyone does that. So the talkback link is a great way to let folks know you replied to them! Anyway, it looks like the event was a success and I appreciate you sharing your thoughts and time. It's fine that you didn't stick with the to-do list for WWHM, the goal was to focus on bringing women together to edit, and/or writing content related to women. So I'm quite impressed with what your group churned out. Also, in regards to the Scholar and Feminist Online article and notability - the key is to have secondary sources (not from the Barnard website) discussing the journal, then that will help it maintain notability. Hope this helps, and thanks for your information. I'll let you know when I post my report, and any information from Mwacha is welcome! Sarah (talk) 20:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Whichvisions, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 20:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you reside in the United States)

I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 17:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]