User talk:What is wrong with you people

April 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. —Theopolisme (talk) 19:38, 15 April 2013 (UTC) [reply]

I don't see how it's "disruptive" to move a current event out of the "History" section and into the "Notable events" section, or to restore a longer and better-referenced version of the copy. What is wrong with you people (talk) 20:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Boston Marathon. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:54, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on your Talk page. What is wrong with you people (talk) 20:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Boston Marathon

Why are you threatening me? Editor "Sonoma's Bridge" created a duplicate section without an appropriate header. There was already a section with multiple refs under "Notable events". I was merely removing the duplicate paragraph. What gives? What is wrong with you people (talk) 19:56, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also: could you explain why you think a section about a current event belongs in the "History" section? What is wrong with you people (talk) 19:57, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What you just ran into is somewhat of a drawback in the anti-vandalism system. Warning messages for vandalism are incremental and most tools automatically increase the vandalism level after each warning. Due to this the wording of the vandalism warnings is also different - Level 1 is friendly, while the level 4 you just received is the last level before a block so it is quite.. let us call it direct. Since several other users already gave you a warning the next level was automatically set at 4, hence the "threat".

As for your edit, have a look at the diff. Your edit (re)inserts a piece of vandalism, stating "tambien is a sadfadf". That is what causes it to be reverted as being vandalism, not the actual content change. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:07, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't what I tried to put in there. Also the article is going to be a mess for the next 24 hours so I'm out. Thanks for taking the time to explain. Hope you and yours are OK. What is wrong with you people (talk) 20:09, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aye, that page is likely going to see some major editing for quite a bit. Sorry for the harshness of the warning though - I saw your edits pass by on huggle before and they looked entirely fine. I didn't notice the username on this one though, or i would have given you a manual nudge to mention the left in line instead pressing revert and warn. (Which, i hoped, would have produced a friendly notice instead of the screaming warning). I'll stripe those warnings as invalid though, since its clear that you are actually busy being constructive. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]