User talk:What does the RIley say?

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at WESH. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges.

You're involved in a content dispute over the location of the transmitter. If you keep reverting, you'll be involved in an edit war—plus you run the risk of violating the three revert rule. —C.Fred (talk) 21:36, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that

Sorry but there is a vandal he is saying that it is located at christmas 
But its Actually in Orange city sure there is a christmas in florida but there is a holiday named for it
From What does the RIley say? (talk) 21:39, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a matter of interpretation. The article on Christmas, Florida, does mention that there are a lot of towers there. However, the FCC database shows the registration in Orange City. So, you're both editing in good faith; nobody is vandalizing the article. —C.Fred (talk) 21:51, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The FCC Database

it shows that its transmitters are located in Orange city

Yep. That's why I let that edit stand. —C.Fred (talk) 23:17, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you What does the RIley say? (talk) 23:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I blocked

I was blocked by a user called BBB he blocked me for no reason at all
he is a bad Checkuser What does the RIley say? (talk) 03:05, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If Bbb23 blocked you based on the results of a checkuser investigation, that tells me he saw some solid evidence that you're abusing multiple accounts. —C.Fred (talk) 03:31, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then what accounts did i abuse

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

What does the RIley say? (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okay so i understand what I have been blocked for And That was for the Edit warring Dispute on the https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WESH&oldid=709596892 Article and I was warned about it then I talked It over with C Fred And he Said it was a good edit and I solved the dispute Without harm i think this block is no longer needed Becuase it violates the Block policy What does the RIley say? (talk) 18:34, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're blocked as an obvious sockpuppet of Shy-Boy (talk · contribs). Unblock requests that don't address this are pointless. Max Semenik (talk) 19:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@What does the RIley say?: CU-blocks will not be reversed by non-Checkusers without Checkuser permission, and Bbb23 is a very good Checkuser, at that. Additionally, please seek an unblock through your main account, as CU-confirmed socks will pretty much never be unblocked. GAB^Hello! 18:38, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Was there a Sockpuppet investigation

A investigation about me