User talk:Wetrace/Backup001

Thank you

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		It was ironic for me to get blocked when defending the existence of "weiquan/human rights lawyers" in Chinese Wikipedia that you have helped creat. Nevertheless, it is something worth defending. Please keep creating such meaningful open content for better and wider civic engagement! --(comparingChinese Wikipedia vs Baidu Baike by hanteng) 16:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Human-harvest-flying-cloud-productions-peabody-winner-2014.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Human-harvest-flying-cloud-productions-peabody-winner-2014.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jsjsjs1111 (talk) 05:30, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

@Jsjsjs1111:, Thank you. It's Reasonable Use in Wikipedia.Wetrace (talk) 06:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Human Harvest (film). When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jsjsjs1111 (talk) 06:55, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Category:Tang Prize has been nominated for discussion

Category:Tang Prize, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. —swpb^T 20:22, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Falun Gong. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 22:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

March 2019

Hello, I'm Tsumikiria. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Shen Yun Performing Arts seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 22:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Shen Yun Performing Arts, you may be blocked from editing. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹🌉 02:12, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Falun Gong. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 13:17, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

FG COI

Hello, Wetrace. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 07:32, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I do not know Why you said me COI? I edits on Human right issue for years.Wetrace (talk) 07:39, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

I see no editing on human rights issues outside of the FG space. 10/10 of your top edited pages and 10/10 of your top edited talk pages are within the (relatively tiny) FG space. Thats an incredible coincidence, one you’re going to need to explain. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 07:56, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I mainly edit on Chinese-Wikipedia. And I established Chinese-Wiki Human-Right-Project. I edited many issue on ZH-wiki, many Chinese human rights activitist and lawyers, Media, Taiwan and Hong kong, International law, and so on. The Falun gong related is one of most severe and important issue for research in human right situation in China. I edit ZH-Wiki, occasionally edit English.

While I indeed wonder that, why FalunGong related articles often be edited with bias and not compliance with wiki-policy, that often happen on Chinese-Wiki. I think these articles should be treat and edited fairly according Wiki-Policy and good source.Wetrace (talk) 08:16, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Can you explain why on the English wikipedia you almost never edit outside of the FG space or edit human rights pages without a direct FG connection? Thats a tiny subset of human rights in China which is a small subset of human rights generally... Idk if you knew but you’re a WP:SPA. 10/10 and 10/10 being in a tiny topic area like FG is almost unprecedented, generally there is a little bit more diversity even among what would still be considered SPAs. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 08:24, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I explained above, of course not WP:SPA.My 360+ edits Not what you said 10/10 on the same issue, I do know why you say so? I mainly edit ZH-Wiki, This human right issue often edit not compliance with wiki-policy, and use Chinese Communist Party's source(non-third-party) , that often happen on Chinese-Wiki, and that make me care, and need to discussion(cost more edits and times). I am not good at English ability, I occasionally also edit this issue on EN-wiki, also for reference. I noted there was arbitration about this issue on EN-wiki , I wanna observe what happen on ZH-wiki and EN-wiki. Wetrace (talk) 08:43, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

And my computer is low bettary now. I have to shut it down.Wetrace (talk) 08:44, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

10/10 of your top edited pages and talk pages are within the FG space... See for yourself: [1]. You have also not explained your connection with FG, feel free to respond when you have more battery. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 09:08, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Let me be even more clear, 8/10 of your top edited pages are *directly* related to FG (The Epoch Times, Human Harvest (film), Shen Yun, Li Hongzhi, Falun Gong, Human Harvest, Teachings of Falun Gong, and Human Harvest (disambiguation)) and two are tangentially related (Magnitsky Act and Freedom of religion in China). Horse Eye Jack (talk) 09:23, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Horse eye Jack, These days I’m too busy to editing wiki. I think I have reply clearly above.

I edit Wikipedia with good-faith and in accordance with Wikipedia policies. I have never been paid to edit Wikipedia. China human right and persecution issue are my concern for many yeas, and I found that Falun Gong are persecuted maybe most severely, that’s a important issue. I mainly edit on ZH-wiki, many China human right issue, and I found FLG related article are often be edited with bias and not compliance with wiki-policy or broken, for years, even articles be requested to delete many times on ZH-Wiki, for example several articles once again today. I do not know Why they do so?

I mainly on ZH-wiki, strange things happened to FLG related articles, made me sometimes edit this issue on EN-wiki. And these days, I found Patcheng's strange edits, I participated discuess and edit.

For me, I edited with good-faith , simple motivation to contribute human right knowledge on wiki. Thank you.Wetrace (talk) 06:58, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Are you affiliated with FG in any way? Its about a lot more than being paid BTW, you can be unpaid and still have COI issues. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 14:44, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)