User talk:Westwourd

Westwourd, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Westwourd! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Hello, I'm Awesome Aasim. I noticed that in this edit to Nicotine, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. A a s i m 22:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Nicotine, you may be blocked from editing. Again, unexplained removal of cited text. David Biddulph (talk) 22:32, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am not, i explained all my editsWestwourd (talk) 22:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said, if you have questions as to the reliability of a source, post here. Further disruptive edits unfortunately lead to sanctions. A a s i m 22:39, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Westwourd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did every edits with a clear explanation going in phase with WP policy of biomedical articles. I simply dont understand why I am being blocked Westwourd (talk) 8:03 am, Today (UTC+9)

Decline reason:

You've been blocked by a checkuser and so can only be unblocked by another checkuser or someone who has consulted with the blocking checkuser (and it'd have to be via email because of WP:OUTING). While I have no qualms with contacting Ponyo in general, that's because of a trusting respect that makes it feel rather pointless to do so. Even if they were (hypothetically) incorrect (which I doubt), your exchange at the Teahouse had me assuming you were on your way to a WP:CIR block anyway.
Your only way out of this (and not guaranteed at that) would be the standard offer. If this is your original account or your original account's talk page access and email have been disabled due to abuse, then you may be able to use this one to agree to the standard offer. Otherwise you need to appeal using your original account. Talk page access for this account will be disabled if your next reply is not a proper appeal or competent, thoughtful, and good-faith question on how to make a proper appeal. Ian.thomson (talk) 23:31, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.