User talk:Westminsterboy
Welcome!
[edit]
I hope you like this place — I sure do — and want to stay. Before getting too in-depth, please read about the simplified ruleset. If you need help on how to title new articles check out the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and the FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. And if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on my user talk page.
Additional tips
[edit]Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!
- If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
- You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
- If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the articles for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
- If you believe something you added or created has been unfairly treated, talk to the user or follow the steps in resolving disputes
- If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
- If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.
Happy Wiki-ing.
[edit]- Trevor MacInnis (Talk | Contribs) 16:40, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Thank you for your nomination of the article. (Though it may be that the information ends up being kept on another page.) However, I suggest you review the deletion procedure again, as voting happens on a subpage of afd, rather than on the talk page. Don't worry, it isn't hard. All you have to do is select the red link, and you can add your reasoning to the page that comes up. Sonic Mew | talk to me 18:02, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
Raine Spencer
[edit]I don't think her latest husband was the title holder of "Comte de Chambrun". As you know, French nobility is quite different from the British Peerage. Any descendant of a French 'peer' can use the title, but is not the title holder, and thus are not considered a 'peer' by British standards. Raine's third husband, I believe, was not the actual title holder, and thus she did not marry a 'peer' by British standards, and therefore retains her courtesy title of Countess Spencer. British widowed peeresses retain their title unless they marry a peer. Courtesy title-holders are not considered peers. Eddo Widowed peeresses lose their title on marriage to a commoner as well as to a peer, so as the divorced wife of a commoner she would be Mrs Raine de Chambrun. As you say, french nobility is complex and I will do more reseaerch on Mr de Chambrun.--Westminsterboy 08:09, 8 November 2005 (UTC) Jean Pierre Francois Joseph Pineton, Marquis de Chambrun, had three sons, Charles the Comte de Chambrun (heir to the title marquis), Comte Jean Francois de Chambrun, who briefly married the widow of the 8th Earl Spencer and Comte Pierre Antoine de Chambrun. --Westminsterboy 10:14, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Debrett on remarried widows
[edit]Widows
A widow who re-marries loses any title or precedence she gained by her previous marriage, and is not recognised as having claim to bear the title of her deceased husband (e.g. at a coronation or other State ceremonial the widow of a Peer would not be summoned as a Peeress if she had subsequently married a commoner and, if having married a Peer of a lesser degree than her former husband, would only be recognised by the rank acquired by her last marriage.). See:- http://www.debretts.co.uk/etiquette/correct_forms_of_address.html#W
--Westminsterboy 10:18, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
- During the French marriage, she was not Countess of Chambrun, she was Countess Jean-Francois de Chambrun, since her husband was a younger son, and, as per French usage, would be referred to as Mme de Chambrun, with the title used only by servants and so-called inferiors.
Cats
[edit]All categories should really belong to the larger network of categories to that the categories are navagable in and of themselves. Now that Special:Uncategorizedcategories is back down to a manageable size, so Categories in that report will tend to stick out. Fplay 14:24, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi Westminsterboy. More 'new editors' on Iain Lee are continually inserting a claim that he is engaged. Slightly more believable than the claim that he is gay, but it's completely unsourced and the modus operandi of the editors inserting it is very similar to those that were inserting the gay claims. They claim that Iain Lee said in an email that he said he was engaged, but this is dubious and unprovable anyway, so it's not a reliable source.
Basically I'm asking you, to put it bluntly, to back me up on this. I can't keep this out by edit warring, and I can't start dispute resolution if it's only me taking the position that this information is dubious, unsourced and should stay out. If more than one editor tries to point out the meaning of 'reliable source' to the 'new editors', we can progress to RFC if they refuse to acknowledge it. Or, of course, you could tell me that you know the thing about him being engaged is actually true, and I'd take your word for it.
I've considered requesting CheckUser for the 'new accounts', but I don't think their edits are obvious enough vandalism to justify it for the moment.
I've posted similar messages to Arniep and JamieHughes (the real one). --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 23:07, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
Hi Westminsterboy, I notice that you have been making a number of edits to the Nick Ferrari article. Please refrain from editing in the way that you have done: it is considered vandalism. I realise that the NPOV rule is more for interpretation and subsequent appropriate application than for adhering to blindly: however, what you have been doing is bang out of order and untrue to Nick's character, unlike an edit I made to Steve Allen's article - Steve is a self-confessed bitch - Nick is not a self-confessed bigot. Nick's article will be on my watchlist for some time: if I see that you've been up to your usual antics again, I shall report you to the notoriously block-happy ChrisO, as, unfortunately, I do not have the power to block you myself. Nonetheless, if you repent of your sins, you will be welcome to make constructive edits to Wikipedia. -- RichardHarrold 20:48, 4 July 2006 (UTC) User:RichardHarrold/Signature.
Thanks!
[edit]Hi Westminsterboy, I see that you have refrained from vandalising the Nick Ferrari article and started making helpful edits instead. Please continue in this vein. Should you ever feel like vandalising an article, go instead to the ironic Wikipedia spin-off Uncyclopedia - they positively encourage that sort of thing. --RichardHarrold 22:16, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Your edit to Raine, comtesse de Chambrun
[edit]Your recent edit to Raine, comtesse de Chambrun (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:59, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Copyvio: Julian Rose
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Julian Rose article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. Craigy (talk) 22:17, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
The 1909 edition of the Catholic Encyclopedia is open source.
The Oratory School logo
[edit]Um, i think the pic u uploaded, is not the oratory's logo. please remove it. Dingyv03 02:36, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
The arms were awarded to the school in 2001--Westminsterboy 11:27, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Listening station, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit]
Hello Westminsterboy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Clive Dytor - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Tim Male - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
The article WorldWide Volunteering has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 21:58, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Westminsterboy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)