User talk:Westfall

Welcome!

Hello, Westfall, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! —User:ACupOfCoffee @ 02:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing that for me. Stupid typos. —User:ACupOfCoffee @ 02:23, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the help with cleanup. Pavel Vozenilek 05:15, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One system to classify articles

is on [1]. How much we will actually see and when is big question. Pavel Vozenilek 05:23, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Magnus Manske is one of main MediaWiki (software used for Wikipedia) developers (see Wikipedia:Magnus Manske Day). Be aware that MediaWiki is project made on shoestring and most of its developers are not paid for the work on it, hence the speed of slug. Pavel Vozenilek 13:37, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS: if you add some information on your user page User:Westfall the links turn blue instead of being red. Being red is one of signals to people to recheck your edit (could be joker, vandal, uninformed newbie, ....). Often, when one's name is recognised as reliable contributor people skip it in checking (a real time-saver).

Thanks for the heads up but I think I'm still a newbie in some ways. :) Westfall 04:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation subheadings

You're quite right that the example at WP:DAB#Longer lists uses bold formatting for the subheadings. I felt that the subheadings stand out well enough by their position alone, without competing with Wikipedia's standard bold formatting for the title term in the leading line. I think this is one of those things that has never been considered carefully (I could be wrong), is not stated explicitly in the MOS, and seems to be done a half dozen different ways in practice. One of these days I'll propose some new wording and put it to a vote. Sorry for the revert. Regards. —Michael Z. 2006-02-26 20:51 Z

Hope to see you around. :) Westfall 04:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure

Sure, but it looks like you already have it up. Evan Robidoux 20:13, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Westfall 04:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hello

thanks Anonymous _anonymous Have a Nice Day 08:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Westfalls

Are you the same person as User:Mayor Westfall and User:Baron Von Westfall? 71.31.150.46 05:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. Westfall 02:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:US Pharmacist magazine (Aug 2005).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:US Pharmacist magazine (Aug 2005).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:12, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of International Training in Communication

A tag has been placed on International Training in Communication, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. DARTH PANDA ^duel 20:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(See AfD.) — Athaenara ✉ 17:40, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article Austin Lane has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 15:24, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Shyness Clinic

The article The Shyness Clinic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LT90001 (talk) 11:42, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]