User talk:Western Province
Public school
[edit]Only English people and the Anglified use the term "public school" to refer to a private school in Scotland. The majority do not, traditionally. It's a nonsensical phrase anyway, when one views how it is used.--MacRusgail (talk) 18:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
I appreciate your point, however, this is not a simple issue of definitions. If you have any real interest in the school or any attachment to it, you would know the true history of this fine institution. I would urge you to read Robert Phillips, 'A Keen Wind Blows', The History of Fettes. In that, you will find that the school was founded as, and based on, a traditional English Public School. Scotland should be proud that they possesses one of the great Public Schools in the UK. Why don't you leave the "editing" to the school and to those who have a true understanding of the place.
- It certainly is an English school, in the same sense that Americans have their own schools outside the United States. The name of the writer, by the way, is Robert PHILP, not Phillips. As with all books commissioned by their subject, it is a bit of a whitewash. If you read "Fifty Years of Fettes College" (some title like that) for example, you can read about how people in Edinburgh - included an MP - resented this alien implant. And this is coming from a book written by former pupils! In Scotland, we use public school in its proper sense, i.e. not a fee paying school. We leave that to our neighbouring country.--MacRusgail (talk) 17:23, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Fettes
[edit]See reply here - Talk:Fettes_College#.27Eton_of_the_North.27_.26_other_schools hippo43 (talk) 22:22, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest
[edit]It would appear that you are Justin Melck. While you probably know more about yourself than anyone else, autobiography is against wikipedia's "conflict of interest" policies.--MacRusgail (talk) 17:25, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
As it transpires I am not! I am just a fan, therefore, I have every right to update his page. That is all.
A tag has been placed on David Peter Mowbray Algernon Howard, 7th Earl of Effingham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 23:52, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)