User talk:Welsh/Archives/2010/September
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Welsh. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welsh
I have put the Wales article forward for GA status. It just needs tweaking, and maybe a heavy-handed swipe from outside to get it in place. I am writing to those who are constant contributors and defenders of Wales and Welsh articles, to not scream at me for doing this, but to help get the article through. If we fail, we fail, there is nothing wrong with that; but Wales should be a Good Article at least and if it takes good intentioned amateurs to reach that then so be it. FruitMonkey (talk) 01:27, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : LIV (August 2010)
|
|
A recap of the month's new Featured and A-Class articles, including a new featured sound |
Our newest A-class medal recipients and this August's top contestants |
|
|
To change your delivery options for this newsletter please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC) | |
The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.
With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team, Roger Davies talk 19:48, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Link repair
Hi Welsh, I've seen you pop up in my watchlist a few times doing link repair. Thanks for the good work! However, I see that decently often you are fixing links by removing accents from the links. (e.g. [1]) Most of the time (in my estimation) removal of these accents results in a less correct name. I see sometimes you redirect rather than removing accents, which seems like a better solution. (Best of all might be to move the target page to include accents as appropriate.) Calliopejen1 (talk) 12:23, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, I understand your point. I have taken the stance that the exisitng article is more likely to be a definitive spelling than the broken link. This, of course, may not be true. However, without extensive external research I cannot determine which is correct. At least this method fixes the redlink, allowing someone else to fix the exact diacritic spelling if they know better. I will bear your point in mind, and look more closely whether I should rename the exisitng article where it's clear which spelling is correct. welsh (talk) 18:21, 30 September 2010 (UTC)