User talk:Welsh/Archives/2008/October
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Welsh. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Assessment
Welsh, I'm getting stick into assessing mainly because I'm a bit fed up of seeing so many unassessed. I've noticed that you are actioning a few too, please tell me if you think I'm off target with any of my leveling. Also I'm not assessing articles I have created or added heavily too if I think they may be more than low importance, so would appreciate if you could view a assess a few pages if you have the time. I also noticed we have yet to assess the National Assembly of Wales, I presume it is top importance, so would that need to be discussed first? Thanks, FruitMonkey (talk) 10:36, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- Just looked and see you have alreasy assessed the Assembly, Cheers. FruitMonkey (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers for keeping up the assessment, most of them are no-brainers. Lots of start/stub and Mid/Low importance tags. The article I've put the most work into is Rhondda but I'm not sure how it should be assessed as I have put my own importance into it and am biased, but do you have a gut reaction regarding it? I won't take offence. Thanks. FruitMonkey (talk) 21:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time. There is such a fantastic wealth of information on industrial Rhondda, then after the war, it appears people got bored of the death and gloom and gave up on writing about it. I'll try and sit down and write about the modern era, I know it's lacking but I need modern books. I'll get back to you when I nail it. Cheers again FruitMonkey (talk) 22:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- I would also like to thank you for setting the Llandow Air Disaster as Mid importance, it was the article that got me 'in to' Wikipedia, and I think it's more imprtant than Low. Cheers. FruitMonkey (talk) 22:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time. There is such a fantastic wealth of information on industrial Rhondda, then after the war, it appears people got bored of the death and gloom and gave up on writing about it. I'll try and sit down and write about the modern era, I know it's lacking but I need modern books. I'll get back to you when I nail it. Cheers again FruitMonkey (talk) 22:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers for keeping up the assessment, most of them are no-brainers. Lots of start/stub and Mid/Low importance tags. The article I've put the most work into is Rhondda but I'm not sure how it should be assessed as I have put my own importance into it and am biased, but do you have a gut reaction regarding it? I won't take offence. Thanks. FruitMonkey (talk) 21:28, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Dear Assessment Team *g* I can see I've come the right place to request a review. If you have the time and are willing to, please assess this article? I am hoping this is a good first step before possibly requesting RfC on the name issue. Yikes am I brave or what? *deep breath* Forging ahead now. ∞☼Geaugagrrl(T)/(C) 02:16, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Almost all turfed out. Gives one a sense of achievement. On the whole I think the correct decisions have been made. We have a differing opinion on what a stub article is, but it's a minor quibble. If we hadn't done it, then we would be here in a years time with 2,000 unassessed articles. Thank you for your educated work which appears far more researched than mine. Yours FM FruitMonkey (talk) 23:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXI (September 2008)
The September 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
IP address blocked
It looks like my ISP's dynamic IP allocation has given me the IP address of a spammer who was active in November 2007. This is not me. Please help. Welsh (talk) 08:43, 12 October 2008 (UTC)