User talk:Wellsheslikesowhatever

If you're trying to show that you should be allowed to edit, intentionally violating WP:SOCK and WP:SIG and then bragging about it is a rather odd way of showing you understand Wikipedia's policies and would be willing to comply with them. --Nlu (talk) 11:03, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wellsheslikesowhatever (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not violating any sock puppet thing! I went to sign up for an account and it let me! Why do you hate me Nlu?

Decline reason:

Yes, the software might not prevent you from signing up for an account, but you are still not allowed to create a second account to avoid a block, as you acknowledge doing here. As a blocked user, you are not permitted to edit Wikipedia. Please, don't create any more accounts. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:52, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've removed your most recent edit, which included a personal attack and which used the {unblock} template without including a reason for unblocking. I'm sorry that you're having so much trouble interacting politely with other people, but until you learn better manners, you won't be able to participate at Wikipedia. If you make further inappropriate use of the {unblock} template, or if you make further personal attacks, I will protect this page. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:00, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wellsheslikesowhatever (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok well then somebody tell me when the f*** my block is up. Its not my fault my IP keeps changing. You f***ing Wiki*** are really starting to **** me off. Since no one can tell me when my block is supposed to expire since Nlu keeps adding on to it without reason, I think I should be unblocked. Happy now?

Decline reason:

See FisherQueen below. — Sandstein (talk) 14:01, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've protected this page; you won't be able to edit it again. Because you are unable to interact politely with others, you should stop using Wikipedia for now. Please don't create any more accounts; just accept that you really are blocked. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:09, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And to answer your question- your block will not expire. It is an indefinite block, which I agree is appropriate. In a few years, when you graduate from high school, if you want to request unblock and explain why you're able to work politely with others, I think that your request will be given a fair chance. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]