User talk:WelcomeAtlas

Say whatever.

"Status" is unencyclopedic

Hi. Concerning your edits in List of characters in Heroes, which you repeated even if they were reverted. See that conditions such "alive", "dead" depend on the episode you watch and when writing about fiction there is not "current status". Check discussions about the use of the term "former". Moreover, other conditions like "imprisoned", "wounded", etc. are a perfect area for speculations. Therefore, there was a consensus against having "status" in list of characters or infoboxes. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:08, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Happyhourisforamatuers.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Happyhourisforamatuers.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 15:36, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Beerinhell.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Beerinhell.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 21:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Thepoliticsofdeviance.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Thepoliticsofdeviance.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Hugostiglitz.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hugostiglitz.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hugo Stiglitz (character)

Stiglitz fails WP:GNG, our inclusion guideline - he does not have multiple sources that talk about the character outside the context of the film. Please stop reverting my attempts to redirect his article to Inglorious Basterds. Ironholds (talk) 16:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you can provide reliable sources showing that he's covered independently (not forum posts, blogs or the like) then fine, but I've yet to see any such thing. Ironholds (talk) 16:48, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quite easy to exclude blogs and forums - our notability guidelines exclude them completely, since they're not reliable sources. Yahoo answers is not a reliable source. IMDB is not a reliable source. Aint It Cool News isn't covering the character, it's simply a news article announcing who will be playing him. None of these sources are enough, so I suggest you let me redirect it. Ironholds (talk) 16:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You won't find any acceptable ones, but go ahead. Ironholds (talk) 16:59, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have you had any luck with refs? Ironholds (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Hugostiglitz.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hugostiglitz.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Hugostiglitz.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hugostiglitz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Jack Merridew 11:17, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:BobbySNL.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:BobbySNL.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:04, 26 May 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:04, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]