User talk:WegianWarrior/archive 3

Anti-Masonry on April 1

FYI... I have asked William to run a user check on Oregano. We shall see. Blueboar 15:03, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ABrowne? Lightbringer!

ABrowne is defo Lightbringer. see Rv. record [1] on his contribution page. Imacomp 20:43, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lightbringer socks

We have some new Lightbringer and/or JASpencer socks: JeffT (talk · contribs), ABrowne (talk · contribs) and Ulsterman81 (talk · contribs). I've tried this: Wikipedia:Requests for CheckUser

Perhaps you want to put these articles on your watch list, too:

--SGOvD webmaster (talk) 07:11, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

Leave it, he's running too many socks to deal with. REported [incidents] and [Checkuser].ALR 11:41, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great, it worked. But what to do against paranoia? I'm still not sure with JASpencer, since this could be the good aspect of this person that expresses its frustration with the other accounts. JASpencer and those socks are never online the same time - or am I in error? --SGOvD webmaster (talk) 14:06, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

How to deal with Quotations

WW... As you may know, JASpencer and I are having a minor argument over how to present quotations that support statements made in the various Freemasonry related articles. JAS preffers to include them in the citations, as footnotes, while I feel they should be included in the main text. Would you be so kind as to check out my sample section at Catholicism and Freemasonry/example and compare it to the same section at the Catholicism and Freemasonry article. I would be interested in your oppinion (as well as those of all the editors of these articles) as to which style you prefer. Feel free to pass this on to any one you feel would give an honest oppinion. (sent to all regular editors of the Freemasonry related pages) Blueboar 18:24, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TFA

I left a question for you at Wikipedia talk:Tomorrow's featured article#Jarmann M1884--you can respond there. Thanks. Chick Bowen 19:57, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back,

See you in a week or so when I get back

Quaesitum est copyright.

Quaesitum est. I know that the document states "In an audience granted to the undersigned Cardinal Prefect, the Supreme Pontiff John Paul II approved and ordered the publication of this Declaration which had been decided in an ordinary meeting of this Sacred Congregation." Since it is published on their site can we just use the link instead? Is it okay to remove the tag now? Thanks. [[[User:Simonapro|Simonapro]] 13:21, 3 May 2006 (UTC)]

You are also invited to view. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Quaesitum_est

Barnstar

For your ongoing efforts in maintaining FM articles, I just wanted to give you my grattitude and some Wiki fluff. Your deeds are appreciated brother. Jachin 06:45, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD for List of Anti-Masons

here MSJapan 01:45, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

curious

im just wondering - seeing that the jarmann article was one which you helped bring up to featured status - whether you were unable to take an objective point of view regarding my removal of the paragraph. i have no interest in the rifle nor anything else to do with norwegian military and im therefore quite confident of my objectivity. you on the other hand have been heavily involved with the article by your own admission, are norwegian and work within the military, and therefore i im quite certain that youve taken a subjective point of view regarding the article. i look forward to hearing your thoughts Tyhopho 15:55, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Translation in french

Hi! I'm currently translating the article about the Krag-Jorgensen in french. Most of the work is done, but as i'm no firearme expert, some terms puzzle me a little bit, and im unsure about the translation... Maybe you could explain me in a few lines what it is exactly, so it will be easier for me to find the right translation. Here are the problematic ones:

Stocked to the muzzle: by this do you mean that rounds are inserted through the muzzle?
Rimmed ammunition, and rimless ammunition...

thx! Whistopathe 16:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thx, your explanations were useful, I managed to find the right translation! Whistopathe 09:04, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harpoon Gun M52

Dear Sir,

My name is Francisco , And i Live in Portugal.

I have a a friend thtat has a M52 harpoon gun, thata belong to his grandfather and he wonts to sell.

I like very much colecting guns.

So wen i saw thte gun, it was in and excelent condition, and all complete, like thte one you can see in the picture you have on the site.

There is a problem, the documents have desapired.

I dont have any idea of how much is it value.

Can you give me some tips.??

Thank you very much for your help,

Francisco Oliveira Martins

Imacomp

Why are you checking me on checkuser? Imacomp 12:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maritime warfare

Just wanted to inform you of the creation of a Maritime warfare task force under the military history project. Inge 17:16, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What links here?

I've just pushed "what links here" on my page, only to find that I'm listed for check user - why? And I have a customised user page initially copied for a Bro's page, (who got blocked the same day) as I'm also in the Craft - is that illegal? PS I would not touch any Freemasonry pages here, after just a cursory look – as what is not directly from a Grand Lodge link is mostly re-heated BS and “locked” to any new editors anyway. Perhaps you’re going to investigate the Sea Cadets and Scouts as well? Thanks for the WELCOME "Bro". Hows about showing some good faith and removing the request? :( Azuredeltascribe 01:26, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK too late, so I'm marked now? I get it, its a witch hunt? So much for open access... Azuredeltascribe 02:04, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:75 mm L45 M32.png

Thanks for uploading Image:75 mm L45 M32.png. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:05, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Freemasonry

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. - BaseballBaby 12:02, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]