User talk:WegenerCenter

July 2016

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 13:30, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WegenerCenter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

WegenerAdmin (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

new username WegenerCenter (talk) 07:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We can't accept a name that sounds like an administrator here at Wikipedia. And we wouldn't allow a role account anyway, such as the "Admin" function rather than a specific person. A named account would be acceptable, such as "Name at Wegener" or something like that, but it would have to be clearly for one person only. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:02, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

WegenerCenter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Daniel@Wegener (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

WegenerCenter (talk) 08:53, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline - no response to questions after 3 days. PhilKnight (talk) 02:22, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Here are a few key questions:

Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
Do you understand conflict of interest?
Do you understand that to be considered for an encyclopedia article, the subject must be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the three important principles above. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:45, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, that username isn't allowed. "@" isn't permitted in usernames for technical reasons (see WP:Username policy#Usernames with non-Latin characters). —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:03, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

However, "Daniel at Wegener" would be acceptable. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:55, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]