User talk:Weekeepeediaisthetruth

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Joe Eubanks, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Joe Eubanks was changed by Weekeepeediaisthetruth (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.852568 on 2012-01-08T20:16:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:16, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Army of Two: The 40th Day. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Army of Two: The 40th Day was changed by Weekeepeediaisthetruth (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956013 on 2012-01-08T20:18:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Hanna – Folge deinem Herzen with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. -down load ׀ talk 20:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Roxy Theatre (Clarksville, Tennessee), you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Roxy Theatre (Clarksville, Tennessee) was changed by Weekeepeediaisthetruth (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.967412 on 2012-01-08T20:24:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 20:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Weekeepeediaisthetruth (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason here where is the reason!???????Weekeepeediaisthetruth (talk) 20:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A very good point... Peridon (talk) 20:55, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Since you have used an unblock request to commit yet more infantile vandalism, your talk page access will be removed to stop you wasting still more of our time. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:57, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]