User talk:Weegee1000

i've been blocked :(

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Weegee1000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 190.61.0.0. Weegee1000 (talk) 13:00, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I would ordinarily give you the link to where you could apply for IP block exemption. But this account was only created a couple of days ago; I am not sure you would be granted IPBE even if you weren't operating on a known, long-term blocked proxy. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:16, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Weegee1000 (talk) 13:00, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polite Cat (August 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SWinxy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The only two non-social media sources are not good journalism sites from the looks of it. The rest of the sources are just non-reliable social media posts. I would suggest WP:TNT and start over.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Polite Cat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SWinxy (talk) 19:28, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Weegee1000! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SWinxy (talk) 19:28, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do better, I promise. Weegee1000 (talk) 13:17, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:23, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Weegee1000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I literally wasn't doing anything wrong with my second account. Yes, I confess I have a second account, but it wasn't to bypass Wikipedia filters and abuse pages. If you got proof, User:Bbb23, show it here. Please, I really need RELIABLE reasons to get blocked, example: you vandalized a page that you otherwise cannot do in your main account. Weegee1000 (talk) 22:34, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have a second account and didn't declare that it was a second account of this one, and you edited with both at a similar time, making yourself seem to be two different people. 331dot (talk) 23:04, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Weegee1000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Look, that was totally accidental, and after my edit, I was planning to declare my second account's existence. Like you said, I SEEMED like two different people, which is something different to BE two different people. Weegee1000 (talk) 17:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request is nonsense. Yamla (talk) 10:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Weegee1000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hope my unblock for both me and my second account is done quickly. Because I will still say it: I did NOTHING wrong. Weegee1000 (talk) 14:09, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Please only make one request at a time. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:10, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In case it isn't clear to other admins, User:Weegee1000/sandbox was an elaborate hoax, and User:Minions2020/sandbox was also a (less elaborate) hoax. Also, Weegee1000's request for full protection of their sandbox was an abuse of administrative noticeboards.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because of continued disruption after warnings, I've revoked TPA.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:54, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Polite Cat

Hello, Weegee1000. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Polite Cat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:04, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]