User talk:WeedDJ

Welcome!

Hello, WeedDJ, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Oah, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 20:52, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Oah

The article Oah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CRYSTALball-like prediction about a recording that has no third party reliable sources to back up assertions.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 20:52, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Timbaland Discography

Hello you may not be aware that their are rules for styles of pages at WP:MOS. for discographies MOS:DISCOG applies which clearly states that tables in a discography should be equally aligned. I have reverted your edits. Please do not edit like this again. If you have any questions please ask. If you reply here please leave the {{talkback}} template on my page or preferably leave a message on my talk page thanks. Lil-unique1 (talk) 20:55, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

per the comment above

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Katy Perry discography, you may be blocked from editing. - eo (talk) 21:59, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Paolo Nutini discography, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - eo (talk) 13:58, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Overtherainbow.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Overtherainbow.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:01, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Allnightlong.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Allnightlong.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WeedDJ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I DO NOT KNOW WHY I HAVE BEEN BLOCKED I HAVE NOT DONE ANYTHING WRONG SO PLEASE UNBLOCK ME

Decline reason:

First, all caps will typically get you ignored, as I don't respond well to shouting. Second, as per this, you have been blocked for using more than one Wikipedia account. So, now you "know" - but even if you did not know, it's not a valid reason for being unblocked (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:21, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{helpme}} I assume this helpme request is related to your block. Your unblock request has been seen and an administrator will deal with it soon. - EdoDodo ^talk 08:25, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I do not deserve to be blocked --WeedDJ (talk) 08:32, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WeedDJ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet of Greenock 125, I DO NOT KNOW who he is so please unblock me

Decline reason:

No idea who Greenock 125 is. However, it's real clear from my own checkuser records that you are abusing multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 20:36, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WeedDJ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I joined wikipedia to improve articles so I deserve to be unblocked it says thank your for your contributions but all my contributions have not been welcome, I am not delibertly abusing multiple accounts I just want to be accepted on wikipedia please. I promise that I will edit better and not do any more vandalism.

Decline reason:

When you signed up to improve articles, you readthe username policy. You decided to create additional accounts, which is therefore a deliberate act. Here's a hint: sock unblocks need to contain a resolution to the problem. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Airswell.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Airswell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:35, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]