User talk:Webdoctor001

May 2015

Hello, I'm Hair. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Website awards with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Hair^Talk 20:56, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

25px|alt=Warning iconPlease stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, you may be blocked from editing. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:07, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

duffbeerforme, it is interesting that you call me disruptive when I am defending an article against your vandalism and continual unfounded deletion of factual substantiated evidence. Your comment above demonstrates that you are experienced in abusing Wikipedia to make it look like others are at fault and that the message is coming from admin. Your own talk page has mulitple discussions about you deleting items without warrant along with the investigation into your actions, also stated on your talk page. These facts lead me to believe you are either a professional shill or have other nefarious motives toward the subject matter of the article in question. Irrespsctive of this, Wikipedia is a place for facts and given that the article in question more than meets the criteria for inclusion and has had no problem for 4 years until you began suspiciously deleting content, it would be appreciated if you stopped your disruptive editing or it is you who may be blocked from editing.Webdoctor001 (talk) 08:38, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

30px|alt=Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:29, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

duffbeerforme I am focussed on the content - it's you that keeps vandalizing it. I think you need to calm down and please desist from harrassing me and abusing wikipedia templates to try and turn this on me. Perhaps follow your own advice and stick to the content. You falsely deleted factual information and got caught. End of story. From wikipedia:

"User space harassment - A common problem is harassment in userspace. Examples include placing numerous false or questionable "warnings" on a user's talk page", "...and otherwise trying to display material the user may find annoying or embarrassing in their user space." "User pages are provided so that editors can provide some general information about themselves and user talk pages are to facilitate communication. Neither is intended as a 'wall of shame' and should not be used to display supposed problems with the user unless the account has been blocked as a result of those issues."

Please do not communicate with me again.

Orphaned non-free image File:CSS Design Awards logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CSS Design Awards logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing and false claims that demonstrate you lack independence to a company. If you continue you may be blocked from editing. It is not the first time someone tell you about this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Papoman001 (talk • contribs) 19:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is obvious you Papoman001 are a sock account that is associated with Awwwards and your other sock Mittens700 (talk · contribs) could not be more obvious. I have agreed with Andy Dingley to delete the website awards page and you along with it. I know this will make you happy because you can hide any articles by whistleblowers. Obviously there is truth in the articles referenced that demonstrate Awwwards is corrupt. No big secret. They just join a long list of corrupt companies not welcome on Wikipedia.