User talk:Weareheretochangetheworld

Hello

First, please choose another username, one which doesn't look offensive. I'm serious. Second, this material is a copyright violation, as it has - as you point out - been posted elsewhere. Wikipedia can only accept text which has been released under a 'free' copyright licence. See WP:C. Please note that I am not disputing its truthfulness, but its presentation. I will remove it again. Please do not revert to restore this wording. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 21:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it reads as "bitch pissed" (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page.

-- The Anome (talk) 21:26, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-un|Weareheretochangetheworld}}

got new username. it isn't a copyright violation if i am the one who wrote it. i am the owner/operator of that site for Richard Gall of Brainstorm Prison Consulting, under Gall Services L.L.C. Weareheretochangetheworld (talk) 23:53, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you are involved in promoting that site and/or individual, the content especially does not belong. See WP:COI. Paraphrasing the content isn't really going to make it neutral and encyclopaedic. Take phrases like "Fortunately his PO was very reasonable, thank God", or "When you are in prison, you really need to know ". Would you expect to read that in Encyclopædia Brittanica? No. This is an encyclopaedia and not a guide, not an advert, nor a directory. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 06:46, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Richard Joseph Gall

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Richard Joseph Gall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 04:11, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]