User talk:WeaponizingArchitecture/2022

MfD nomination of User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Userboxes/Discord

User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Userboxes/Discord, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Userboxes/Discord and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Userboxes/Discord during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Aasim (talk) 15:45, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Otam yes (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

sir this was from a year ago WeaponizingArchitecture | scream at me 18:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Aasim (talk) 15:57, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

A page you created has been deleted as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Amortias (T)(C) 16:03, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate talk page postings

Good afternoon,

Would you be so kind as to explain this [1]. Given this and your recent page that was deleted you were lucky to not get a harrassment block off either of them or the total of them combined. Amortias (T)(C) 16:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Viiticus is my friend. Hes seen the image and doesn’t seem to mind it. WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 17:08, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to be a tad more careful in that case, a talkpage heading that looks inappropriate followed up by an image that is titled "die a violent death" is likely to set off all sorts of alarm bells. Amortias (T)(C) 17:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

got it. WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 18:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Trivia

User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Trivia, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Trivia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Trivia during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Aasim (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:WeaponizingArchitecture/mi mayors

User:WeaponizingArchitecture/mi mayors, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WeaponizingArchitecture/mi mayors and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:WeaponizingArchitecture/mi mayors during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Aasim (talk) 17:31, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Directory

User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Directory, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Directory and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:WeaponizingArchitecture/Directory during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Leomk0403 (Don't shout here, Shout here!) 09:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:FloatingImage

Template:FloatingImage has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Aasim (talk) 15:22, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On that note - can you please take a look at Wikipedia:User pages to see what is okay for you to have on your userpage? That image blocks important links (namely the Wikipedia logo), makes sidebar text unreadable, and creates all sorts of problems for certain antivandalism tools. We are an encyclopedia project, not a personal sandbox. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis 02:21, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chula Vista, California. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fenton, Michigan

To address your points:

The logo I placed on the article *is* on the website, they recently updated the website - https://www.cityoffenton.org
Even if it wasn't at the time, it still doesn't automatically make "Fenton Be Closer" the official logo of the city.

If we can restore the actual logo amicably, that would be appreciated.

Vypr (talk) 19:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good for now, but I want to know if that IS the logo, or if it's the city seal. Tourism logos are sometimes used for that space (Example: Cleveland, Ohio, but Mostly if the city itself does not have a logo.) Please let me know if you found anything new. Thanks!

WeaponizingArchitecture | talk to me 21:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be used as a logo, it's on the website and official government-related vehicles (like snow plow trucks, as an example). It doesn't really fit the idea of a "seal", you couldn't imprint it with colors of course. Vypr (talk) 23:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I might do some digging myself to provide more information.

WeaponizingArchitecture | talk to me 00:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Davenport, Iowa

I don't want to get into an edit war over the photos you added at Davenport, Iowa. My concern now is this photo, which is low-quality because of the huge smudge in the clouds, and another in the water (you need your sensor cleaned). With your permission, let me upload a cleaned version. You can revert if you don't like it. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 15:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Where's the cleaner version? WeaponizingArchitecture | scream at me 19:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's on my hard drive (I erased the spots), but I cannot overwrite your photo without permission. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Id like to see it first before i give permission. WeaponizingArchitecture | scream at me 20:30, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made changes to the contrast as well. I'll just upload as a new file, with attribution. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:24, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What's the filename? again, id like to see. WeaponizingArchitecture | scream at me 22:00, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]