User talk:Wcwatchdog

Question for administrator

{{adminhelp}}

Hello, I've recently gotten in to an edit war over this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Flag_Wing_Chun

The Engchunkun user appears to be a corporate shill for the product (from his frequent regenerations of the page). The user has often deleted what i write when it is a criticism of the product and now has re-termed everything I wrote as "slander" and has just generally gone off the deep end on that page - it's a mess now. What should I do to get it cleaned up where both sides are cleanly and neutrally presented?

--Wcwatchdog (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What a mess of a page! I've protected it for now. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:57, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Further edits via the talk page or go for dispute resolution. I'll try and find a "good" earlier version Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Wcwatchdog. You have new messages at Ronhjones's talk page.
Message added 23:04, 15 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Notes and things to remember

Ronhjones,

Thanks for your help protecting the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hek_Ki_Boen_Eng_Chun_Kungfu

I have never edited a protected page before, I'd like to help clean up the article further. Per your comment this should be done on the talk page. How do things get moved from the talk page to the actual article? Do I need a special tag so an admin can move it over or something?

Thanks, Wcwatchdog (talk) 21:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Start a new section (two equal signs each end of a title on its own line), then ideally suggest some edits, and if most people agree then copy this - {{editprotected}} - to that section , and an admin will come along and do the edit for you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:03, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ron, you are the man! Wcwatchdog (talk) 23:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Hek Ki Boen Eng Chun Kungfu, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:54, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook and Blogspot are not reliable sources. Please WP:IRS and WP:OR before you want to restore the material you added. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 22:34, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube can be a reference when there is a video that help prove something, for example a note given in a broadcast, like CNN or Australian Broadcasting Corporation. But we should be carefully here. As anybody can upload a video a YouTube, there are multiple videos from one event, for example, how many videos appear if you search a song like Bad Romance. Only we can use the copyholder's link, the copyholder is the person who directed/produced/published the video, and in this case we can use only the video published by LadyGagaVEVO and not other videos, as they don't have the permission of the copyholder to retransmit it. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:09, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]